Maternal caffeine consumption and small for gestational age births: results from a population-based case-control study
Open accessAbstract
Caffeine is consumed in various forms during pregnancy, has increased half-life during pregnancy and crosses the placental barrier. Small for gestational age (SGA) is an important perinatal outcome and has been associated with long term complications. We examined the association between maternal caffeine intake and SGA using National Birth Defects Prevention Study data. Non-malformed live born infants with an estimated date of delivery from 1997-2007 (n = 7,943) were included in this analysis. Maternal caffeine exposure was examined as total caffeine intake and individual caffeinated beverage type (coffee, tea, and soda); sex-, race/ethnic-, and parity-specific growth curves were constructed to estimate SGA births. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. Interaction with caffeine exposures was assessed for maternal smoking, vasoconstrictor medication use, and folic acid. Six hundred forty-eight infants (8.2%) were found to be SGA in this analysis. Increasing aORs were observed for increasing intakes of total caffeine and for each caffeinated beverage with aORs (adjusting for maternal education, high blood pressure, and smoking) ranging from 1.3 to 2.1 for the highest intake categories (300+ mg/day total caffeine and 3+ servings/day for each beverage type). Little indication of additive interaction by maternal smoking, vasoconstrictor medication use, or folic acid intake was observed. We observed an increase in SGA births for mothers with higher caffeine intake, particularly for those consuming 300+ mg of caffeine per day. Increased aORs were also observed for tea intake but were more attenuated for coffee and soda intake.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies have reported a significant negative association between maternal caffeine consumption and birth weight.
“Several studies have reported a significant negative association between maternal caffeine consumption and birth weight (84, 85, 140–142).”
From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [140]
Hoyt et al. found the odds ratios of having a low-birth weight baby increased to a range of 1.3-2.1 in women consuming more than 300 mg/day of caffeine during pregnancy.
“Another study by Hoyt et al. (140) found the odds ratios of having a low-birth weight baby increased to a range of 1.3–2.1 in women consuming more than 300 mg/day of caffeine during pregnancy (140).”
From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [140]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 58
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [7]Carlo WA 2011 Prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction Kliegman RM Behrman RE Jenson HB Stanton BF Nelson textbook of pediatrics 19th chap 91.2 Philadelphia, PA Saunders Elsevier
- [33]Committee on Obstetric Practice 2010 Moderate caffeine consumption during pregnancy Obstetrics and Gynecology 116 2 467 468 20664420
- [49]Arts I van De Putte B Hollman P 2000 Catechin contents of foods commonly consumed in the Netherlands Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 48 5 1752 1757 10820090
- Authors
- Study, T. N. B. D. P., Hoyt, A. T., Browne, M., Richardson, S., Romitti, P., & Druschel, C.
- Affiliations
- Texas Department of State Health Services (US)
- New York State Department of Health (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hoyt, Adrienne T.
- Venue
- Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Published
- 2013-11-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1540-1551
- ISSN
- 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6628
- PMC
- PMC5896301
- OpenAlex
- W1987669562
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01DD000492, U01DD001035, U01DD000494, U01/DD00048702)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- maternal caffeine intake, small for gestational age, pregnancy, coffee consumption, tea consumption, soft drink consumption, maternal smoking, folic acid, infant growth, birth weight
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Caffeine, Carbonated Beverages, Coffee, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Male, Pregnancy, Tea, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review