Cited by 40Coffee research and impactsPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsPregnancy and Medication Impact

Exploring maternal patterns of dietary caffeine consumption before conception and during pregnancy

Open access
National Birth Defects Prevention Study, Chen, Lei, Bell, Erin M., Browne, Marilyn L., Druschel, Charlotte M., Romitti, Paul A.·2014·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

We describe patterns of dietary caffeine consumption before and after pregnancy recognition in a cohort of women who recently gave birth. This study included 8,347 mothers of non-malformed liveborn control infants who participated in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study during 1997-2007. Maternal self-reported consumption of beverages (caffeinated coffee, tea, and soda) and chocolate the year before pregnancy was used to estimate caffeine intake. The proportions of prepregnancy caffeine consumption stratified by maternal characteristics are reported. In addition, patterns of reported change in consumption before and after pregnancy were examined by maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated to assess factors most associated with change in consumption. About 97 % of mothers reported any caffeine consumption (average intake of 129.9 mg/day the year before pregnancy) and soda was the primary source of caffeine. The proportion of mothers reporting dietary caffeine intake of more than 300 mg/day was significantly increased among those who smoked cigarettes or drank alcohol. Most mothers stopped or decreased their caffeinated beverage consumption during pregnancy. Young maternal age and unintended pregnancy were associated with increases in consumption during pregnancy. Dietary caffeine consumption during pregnancy is still common in the US. A high level of caffeine intake was associated with known risk factors for adverse reproductive outcomes. Future studies may improve the maternal caffeine exposure assessment by acquiring additional information regarding the timing and amount of change in caffeine consumption after pregnancy recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-014-1483-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preclinical studies have found that antagonizing adenosine receptors, including with caffeine, has neuroprotective effects during aging and in neurological disorders by slowing cognitive decline and the progression of the disorders.

    “Numerous preclinical studies have found that antagonizing adenosine receptors, including with caffeine, has neuroprotective effects during aging and in neurological disorders by slowing cognitive decline and the progression of the disorders [reviewed in Ref. (84, 85)].”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [85]

  • Several studies have reported a significant negative association between maternal caffeine consumption and birth weight.

    “Several studies have reported a significant negative association between maternal caffeine consumption and birth weight (84, 85, 140–142).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [85]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Goyan JE Statement by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs F.D. Administration 1980 Federal Drug Administration Press

Authors
Study, N. B. D. P., Chen, L., Bell, E. M., Browne, M. L., Druschel, C. M., & Romitti, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Lei
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2014-05-04
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
2446-2455
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2002956894
Cited by
40
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • New York State Department of Health
  • State of New Jersey Department of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01DD000492, U01DD001035, U01/DD00048702)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
maternal caffeine intake, pregnancy, preconceptions, coffee, tea, soft drinks, chocolate, smoking, alcohol consumption, unintended pregnancy, maternal age, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, birth defects prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Beverages, Caffeine, Carbonated Beverages, Coffee, Diet, Diet Surveys, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Mothers, Population Surveillance, Pregnancy, Tea, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review