Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Women with Gestational Diabetes and Morbid Obesity
Abstract
Objectives Our aim was to investigate the greatest gestational weight gain (GWG) without adverse pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and morbid obesity. Methods An observational retrospective study including 3284 patients with single pregnancies and GDM was completed. Of the patients, 131 (4.0%) were classified as having pre-pregnancy morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m 2). Perinatal complications were compared among BMI groups. In the group with morbid obesity, GWG threshold values to predict outcomes were examined based on sensitivity and specificity values under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results GWG was higher in mothers with morbid obesity and macrosomic neonates: 11.3 (4.4-15.7) versus 4.8 (1.5-8.2) kg (p = 0.033). The GWG and neonatal ponderal index were positively correlated (r = 0.305, p = 0.001). The GWG was 7.0 (2.9-11.6) kg in women with hypertensive disorder versus 4.5 (1.0-7.5) kg in normotensive women (p = 0.017). A GWG above 5 kg was a risk factor for macrosomia (87.8% sensitivity, 54.7% specificity) and hypertensive disorder (70.0% sensitivity, 48.4% specificity). GWG associations were maintained after controlling for glycemic control, maternal and gestational age, parity, smoking and neonatal sex. Conclusions for practice A GWG below 5 kg is recommended for women with GDM and morbid obesity. In these women, adequate GWG may prevent macrosomia, fetal overgrowth and hypertensive disorder.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A GWG of less than 5 kg in women with morbid obesity and GDM reduces the risk of macrosomia and hypertension without inducing pregnancy complications.
“A GWG of less than 5 kg in women with morbid obesity and GDM reduces the risk of macrosomia and hypertension without inducing pregnancy complications [52].”
From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cheong, L., Law, L. S.-C., Tan, L. Y. L., Amal, A. A.-A., Khoo, C. M., & Eng, P. C. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17071210 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barquiel, B., Herranz, L., Meneses, D., Moreno, Ó., Hillman, N., Burgos, M. Á., & Bartha, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Barquiel, Beatriz
- Venue
- Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Published
- 2018-03-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1297-1305
- ISSN
- 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6628
- OpenAlex
- W2790577559
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Keywords
- gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, perinatal complications, fetal overgrowth
- MeSH terms
- Gestational Weight Gain, Adult, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Obesity, Morbid, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Weight Gain, Diabetes, Gestational, Risk Reduction Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review