Cited by 13Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Women with Gestational Diabetes and Morbid Obesity

Barquiel, Beatriz, Herranz, Lucrecia, Meneses, Diego, Moreno, Óscar, Hillman, Natalia, Burgos, Mª Ángeles, Bartha, José Luis·2018·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

Objectives Our aim was to investigate the greatest gestational weight gain (GWG) without adverse pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and morbid obesity. Methods An observational retrospective study including 3284 patients with single pregnancies and GDM was completed. Of the patients, 131 (4.0%) were classified as having pre-pregnancy morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m 2). Perinatal complications were compared among BMI groups. In the group with morbid obesity, GWG threshold values to predict outcomes were examined based on sensitivity and specificity values under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results GWG was higher in mothers with morbid obesity and macrosomic neonates: 11.3 (4.4-15.7) versus 4.8 (1.5-8.2) kg (p = 0.033). The GWG and neonatal ponderal index were positively correlated (r = 0.305, p = 0.001). The GWG was 7.0 (2.9-11.6) kg in women with hypertensive disorder versus 4.5 (1.0-7.5) kg in normotensive women (p = 0.017). A GWG above 5 kg was a risk factor for macrosomia (87.8% sensitivity, 54.7% specificity) and hypertensive disorder (70.0% sensitivity, 48.4% specificity). GWG associations were maintained after controlling for glycemic control, maternal and gestational age, parity, smoking and neonatal sex. Conclusions for practice A GWG below 5 kg is recommended for women with GDM and morbid obesity. In these women, adequate GWG may prevent macrosomia, fetal overgrowth and hypertensive disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-018-2510-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barquiel, B., Herranz, L., Meneses, D., Moreno, Ó., Hillman, N., Burgos, M. Á., & Bartha, J. L.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
Corresponding author
Barquiel, Beatriz
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1297-1305
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2790577559
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, perinatal complications, fetal overgrowth
MeSH terms
Gestational Weight Gain, Adult, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Obesity, Morbid, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Weight Gain, Diabetes, Gestational, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review