Barriers to Postpartum Care: A Mixed Methods Study of Midwestern Postpartum Women
Abstract
Purpose Postpartum care is an opportunity to provide essential follow-up care to people who have given birth, but inequalities in access by race and socioeconomic status (SES) are well-documented. The purpose of this study is to provide an in-depth description of the barriers to postpartum care using a mixed-methods design. Methods Mixed method analyses using convergent design with three stages including (1) bivariate logistic regression of survey data representative of postpartum women in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, (2) thematic qualitative analyses of focus group interviews of survey participants, and (3) bivariate logistic regression and logistic regression meditation analyses using themes operationalized with survey data measures. Results In Kalamazoo county, 82.0% of women attended their postpartum visit. White women and women with higher SES were 2.84 (SE = 1.35, p Conclusions for practice The qualitative findings identify barriers that are amenable to practice-level interventions including changes to scheduling procedures and employing patient-centered care. The quantitative findings further suggest that although inequalities in postpartum care are present, interventions on these barriers may benefit women regardless of race and SES.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The abrupt end to support services leads to adverse outcomes, especially among marginalised populations who already face barriers to healthcare.
“This abrupt end to support services leads to adverse outcomes, especially among marginalised populations who already face barriers to healthcare (Tierney et al., 2024).”
From Extending the continuum: Mapping post-6-week nurse/midwife-led interventions for postnatal women – A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as Tierney et al., 2024
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Tierney, K. I., Pearce, N., Miller, E., Steiner, A., Tighe, K., Presberry, J., & Kothari, C.
- Affiliations
- Western Michigan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tierney, Katherine I.
- Venue
- Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Published
- 2023-10-30
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-103
- ISSN
- 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6628
- OpenAlex
- W4388033393
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United Way of Battle Creek Kalamazoo Foundation (United Way of Battle Creek Kalamazoo Foundation)
- Healthy Babies Healthy Start (Healthy Babies Healthy Start (Kalamazoo County Health and Community Services / HRSA Healthy Start))
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- postpartum care, postpartum visit attendance, barriers to care, racial disparities, socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, appointment scheduling, patient-centered care, postpartum women, Kalamazoo County
- MeSH terms
- Child, Female, Humans, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Logistic Models, Focus Groups, Postpartum Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review