Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 48Mental Health Treatment and AccessHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“We Always Live in Fear”: Antidepressant Prescriptions by Unlicensed Doctors in India

Open access
Ecks, Stefan, Basu, Soumita·2014·Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry

Abstract

In India, psychopharmaceuticals have seeped deep into both formal and informal pharmaceutical markets, and unlicensed "quack" doctors have become ready prescribers of psychotropics. These ethnographic insights trouble policies that aim at closing the treatment gap for psychiatric medications by "task shifting" to low-skilled health workers as if medications were exclusively available by prescription from public sector psychiatrists. This article describes what these doctors, known as rural medical practitioners (RMPs), know about psychotropics and how they use them in everyday practice. Unlicensed doctors learn about psychopharmaceuticals through exchanges with licensed doctors, through visits by drug companies' sales representatives, and through prescriptions brought by patients. Although the RMPs exist outside the margins of legitimacy, they are constrained by a web of relations with patients, licensed doctors, pharmacists, drug wholesalers, and government agents. The RMPs do not only prescribe but also dispense, which leads to conflicts with licensed medicine sellers. They "always live in fear" both because they are illegal prescribers and because they are illegal sellers of medications. The article shows that any form of strategic ignorance among policy makers about the local importance of informal practitioners in India can only lead to lopsided interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11013-014-9368-9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. World Health Organization. 2008. mhGAP, Mental Health Gap Action Programme: Scaling up Care for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. World Health Organization. 2010. mhGAP Intervention Guide for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders in Non-Specialized Health Settings: Mental Health Gap Action Programme. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Cited by

See all 48

Metadata

Authors
Ecks, S., & Basu, S.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Ecks, Stefan
Venue
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
Published
2014-04-05
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
197-216
ISSN
  • 0165-005X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-076X
OpenAlex
W2035638452
Cited by
46
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
  • other-oa
  • www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Culture Medicine and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fondation Brocher
  • Department for International Development
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-167-25-0110)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
antidepressant prescribing, psychotropic drugs, task shifting, medication dispensing
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Clinical Competence, Patient Care, Health Personnel, Humans, India, Interprofessional Relations, Legislation, Medical, Licensure, Medical, Marketing of Health Services, Drug Prescriptions, Psychotropic Drugs, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.