Cited by 29Psychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Self-improving AI: an Analysis

Hall, John Storrs·2007·Minds and Machines

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11023-007-9065-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 29

Authors
Hall, J. S.
Corresponding author
Hall, John Storrs
Venue
Minds and Machines
Published
2007-09-07
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
249-259
ISSN
  • 0924-6495 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8641
OpenAlex
W1966427255
Cited by
29
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Minds and Machines (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
self-improving AI, machine learning, human development, technological optimism, Turing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review