Cited by 144Ethics and Social Impacts of AIPsychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceArtificial Intelligence Applications

Thinking Inside the Box: Controlling and Using an Oracle AI

Armstrong, Stuart, Sandberg, Anders, Bostrom, Nick·2012·Minds and Machines

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11023-012-9282-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thus far, the vast majority of all AI safety research has focused on the case of a single AI system, often (implicitly) in the context of a single human.

    “Thus far, the vast majority of all AI safety research has focused on the case of a single AI system, often (implicitly) in the context of a single human (see, e.g., Amodei et al., 2016; Armstrong et al., 2012; Christiano et al., 2018; Dalrymple et al., 2024; Hadfield-Menell et al., 2016; Hendrycks et al., 2021; Leike et al., 2018).”

    From Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI (2025) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2012

  • The GS AI approach remains agnostic about both how the core AI system was produced, and about what containment or boxing methods are used.

    “Note that the GS AI approach remains agnostic about both how the”

    From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2012

  • We may require that the AI has no incentive to influence any part of the external world, or to find out any information about the external world.

    “For example, we may require that the AI has no incentive to influence any part of the external world, or to find out any information about the external world (e.g.Armstrong et al., 2012;Armstrong & O'Rorke, 2018;Armstrong & O'Rourke, 2018;Everitt et al., 2021;van Merwijk et al., 2022).”

    From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, S., Sandberg, A., & Bostrom, N.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, Stuart
Venue
Minds and Machines
Published
2012-06-06
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
299-324
ISSN
  • 0924-6495 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8641
OpenAlex
W2088731121
Cited by
144
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
18.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Minds and Machines (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
AI safety, superintelligence, artificial intelligence control, human-level intelligence, AI alignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review