Carbon dioxide capture and storage: seven years after the IPCC special report.
Open accessAbstract
Seven years after the IPCC special report
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The general development of mineralization processes is largely held back by a mix of technical and economic reasons.
“However, as it currently stands, the general development of mineralization processes is largely held back by a mix of technical and economic reasons.”
From Mineralization Technology for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (2020) · cites this paper as Kheshgi et al., 2012
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Clarke L, Böhringer C, Rutherford TF (eds) (2009) International, U.S., and E.U. climate change control scenarios: results from EMF 22. Energy Economics 31(S2): S63–S305. · DOI
- Hamilton MR, Herzog HJ, Parsons JE (2009) Cost and U.S. public policy for new coal power plants with carbon capture and sequestration. Energy Procedia 1(1):4487–4494 · DOI
- IEA (2008) Energy technology perspectives 2008. OECD/IEA, Paris
- IEA (2010a) Energy technology perspectives 2010. OECD/IEA, Paris
- IEA (2010b) Carbon capture and storage—progress and next steps. OECD/IEA, Paris
- IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. In: Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer LJ (eds) Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA, p 442
- Meadowcroft J, Langhelle O (eds) (2009) Caching the carbon: the politics and policy of carbon capture and storage. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK
- MIT (2007) The future of coal: options for a carbon-constrained world. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
- MIT (2009) Retrofitting of coal-fired power plants for CO2 emissions reductions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
- NETL (2007) Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants, vol. 1, DOE/NETL-2007/1281, 516. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pan, S.-Y., Chang, E. E., & Chiang, P.-C. (2012) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.06.0149 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Mineralization Technology for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage
Hills, C. D., Tripathi, N., & Carey, P. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00142 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kheshgi, H., de Coninck, H., & Kessels, J.
- Affiliations
- ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
- Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (NL)
- IEA Clean Coal Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kheshgi, Haroon
- Venue
- Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
- Published
- 2012-05-29
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 563-567
- ISSN
- 1381-2386 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1596
- OpenAlex
- W2076074506
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- carbon capture and storage, IPCC special report, climate change mitigation, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon sequestration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
