Cited by 253Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Prosocial behavior increases well-being and vitality even without contact with the beneficiary: Causal and behavioral evidence

Martela, Frank, Ryan, Richard M.·2016·Motivation and Emotion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11031-016-9552-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 253

Authors
Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Martela, Frank
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
2016-03-28
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
351-357
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W2321186895
Cited by
253
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
22.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
prosocial behavior, well-being, vitality, positive affect, meaningfulness, anonymity, social relatedness, autonomy, competence, need satisfaction, video games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review