Cited by 70CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

CRISPR-based genome editing in wheat: a comprehensive review and future prospects

Kumar, Rakesh, Kaur, Amandeep, Pandey, Ankita, Mamrutha, H. M., Singh, G. P.·2019·Molecular Biology Reports

Abstract

CRISPR technology has vividly increased its applications in last five years for genome editing in a wide range of organisms from bacteria to plants. It is mostly applied in the field of mammalian research. This emerging versatile tool can be utilized in crop improvement by targeting various traits to increase economic value and adaptability of the crop species under changing climate. In plants, Arabidopsis and rice are the most studied plant species in genome editing through CRISPR technology. Wheat is lagging behind in the utilization of CRISPR based genome modifications. The hexaploid, large genome size and the recalcitrant nature in terms of tissue culture are the major obstacles for CRISPR utilization in wheat. Recently, the IWGSC released the high quality of reference genome for wheat which will greatly accelerate the application of CRISPR-based genome engineering in wheat and helps to resolve the global issue of food security in coming decades. The exogenous DNA-free improved mutants with CRISPR technology having desired traits will increase the productivity under biotic and abiotic stress conditions. To address complex traits involving multigene, recently developed multiplex genome editing toolkits can be used. This is a first review of its kind in which the practical utilization and updates on CRISPR validation in wheat along with its future prospects for use of this technology in wheat improvement are comprehensively discussed. Thus, the compiled information will immensely benefit the researchers for utilization of CRISPR system in wheat improvement across the globe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11033-019-04761-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 70

Authors
Kumar, R., Kaur, A., Pandey, A., Mamrutha, H. M., & Singh, G. P.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IN)
  • Banasthali University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mamrutha, H. M.
Venue
Molecular Biology Reports
Published
2019-04-02
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
3557-3569
ISSN
  • 0301-4851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4978
OpenAlex
W2928655331
Cited by
70
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Biology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (1006474)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
CRISPR gene editing, wheat, crop improvement, multiplex genome editing, abiotic stress tolerance, biotic stress resistance, food security, hexaploid genome
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Genetic Engineering, Poaceae, Triticum, Genes, Plant, Genome, Plant, Plants, Genetically Modified, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review