Cited by 4Inertial Sensor and NavigationContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies

The online estimation of the joint angle based on the gravity acceleration using the accelerometer and gyroscope in the wireless networks

Ding, Zhen, Yang, Chifu, Ma, Jiantao, Wei, JianGuo, Jiang, Feng·2020·Multimedia Tools and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11042-019-07911-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 4

Authors
Ding, Z., Yang, C., Ma, J., Wei, J., & Jiang, F.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Feng
Venue
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Published
2019-07-11
Volume
79
Issue
23-24
Pages
16265-16279
ISSN
  • 1380-7501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7721
OpenAlex
W2958255301
Cited by
4
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multimedia Tools and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Keywords
joint angle estimation, inertial measurement unit, accelerometer, gyroscope, rotation matrices, hip joint, knee joint, sagittal plane, online estimation, wireless sensor networks, human motion monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review