Cited by 62Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionMathematical Dynamics and FractalsChaos control and synchronization

An improved digital logistic map and its application in image encryption

Xiang, Hongyue, Liu, Lingfeng·2020·Multimedia Tools and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11042-020-09595-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiang, H., & Liu, L.
Affiliations
Nanchang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Lingfeng
Venue
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Published
2020-08-15
Volume
79
Issue
41-42
Pages
30329-30355
ISSN
  • 1380-7501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7721
OpenAlex
W3049308893
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multimedia Tools and Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61862042)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
logistic map, chaotic maps, image encryption, digital chaotic systems, finite precision effects, dynamic degradation, chaotic sequence generation, color image encryption, grayscale image encryption, attack resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review