The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase II trials of erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with recurrent meningioma
Open accessAbstract
There are no established treatments for recurrent meningioma when surgical and radiation options are exhausted. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is often over-expressed in meningiomas and may promote tumor growth. In open label, single arm phase II studies of the EGFR inhibitors gefitinib (NABTC 00-01) and erlotinib (NABTC 01-03) for recurrent malignant gliomas, we included exploratory subsets of recurrent meningioma patients. We have pooled the data and report the results here. Patients with recurrent histologically confirmed meningiomas with no more than 2 previous chemotherapy regimens were treated with gefitinib 500 mg/day or erlotinib 150 mg/day until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Twenty-five eligible patients were enrolled with median age 57 years (range 29–81) and median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score 90 (range 60–100). Sixteen patients (64%) received gefitinib and 9 (36%) erlotinib. Eight patients (32%) had benign tumors, 9 (36%) atypical, and 8 (32%) malignant. For benign tumors, the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) was 25%, 12-month PFS (PFS12) 13%, 6-month overall survival (OS6) 63%, and 12-month OS (OS12) 50%. For atypical and malignant tumors, PFS6 was 29%, PFS12 18%, OS6 71%, and OS12 65%. The PFS and OS were not significantly different by histology. There were no objective imaging responses, but 8 patients (32%) maintained stable disease. Although treatment was well-tolerated, neither gefitinib nor erlotinib appear to have significant activity against recurrent meningioma. The role of EGFR inhibitors in meningiomas is unclear. Evaluation of multi-targeted inhibitors and EGFR inhibitors in combination with other targeted molecular agents may be warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
Macdonald, D. R., Cascino, T. L., Schold, S. C., & Cairncross, J. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1277 · Cited by 2,409
Cited by
EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas
Goldbrunner, R., Minniti, G., Preusser, M., Jenkinson, M. D., Sallabanda, K., Houdart, E., von Deimling, A., Stavrinou, P., Lefranc, F., Lund-Johansen, M., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30321-7 · Cited by 854
Kaley, T., Barani, I., Chamberlain, M., McDermott, M., Panageas, K., Raizer, J., Rogers, L., Schiff, D., Vogelbaum, M., Weber, D., et al. (2014) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/not330 · Cited by 270
Self-citationRepurposing antifungal drugs for cancer therapy
Weng, N., Zhang, Z., Tan, Y., Zhang, X., Wei, X., & Zhu, Q. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.018 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Norden, A. D., Raizer, J. J., Abrey, L. E., Lamborn, K. R., Lassman, A. B., Chang, S. M., Yung, W. K. A., Gilbert, M. R., Fine, H. A., Mehta, M., DeAngelis, L. M., Cloughesy, T. F., Robins, H. I., Aldape, K., Dancey, J., Prados, M. D., Lieberman, F., & Wen, P. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuro-Oncology
- Published
- 2009-06-28
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-217
- ISSN
- 0167-594X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7373
- OpenAlex
- W2146502430
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II trials of erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with recurrent meningioma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11060-009-9948-7
- The paper
- Norden, A. D., Raizer, J. J., Abrey, L. E., Lamborn, K. R., Lassman, A. B., Chang, S. M., Yung, W. K. A., Gilbert, M. R., Fine, H. A., Mehta, M., DeAngelis, L. M., Cloughesy, T. F., Robins, H. I., Aldape, K., Dancey, J., Prados, M. D., Lieberman, F., & Wen, P. Y. (2010). Phase II trials of erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with recurrent meningioma. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-9948-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.