Cited by 115

Effects of hypoxia on expression of a panel of stem cell and chemoresistance markers in glioblastoma-derived spheroids

Kolenda, Jesper, Jensen, Stine Skov, Aaberg-Jessen, Charlotte, Christensen, Karina, Andersen, Claus, Brünner, Nils, Kristensen, Bjarne Winther·2011·Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

Tumor hypoxia has been attributed to play a crucial role in tumorigenesis and therapeutic resistance. Recently, it has been suggested that hypoxia leads to and maintains the undifferentiated state of tumor stem cells, thereby contributing to chemoresistance. The aim of the present study is to investigate the influence of hypoxia on the protein expression of a panel of stem cell and chemoresistance markers using in vivo-like multicellular tumor spheroids derived from a glioblastoma short-term culture with tumor stem cell properties (SJ-1) as well as a conventional glioblastoma cell line (U87). Spheroids were formed in 21% and 1% O(2) in serum-free medium. The immunohistochemical panel included hypoxia (HIF-1α, HIF-2α), proliferation (Ki-67), and stem cell markers (CD133, podoplanin, Bmi-1, nestin, Sox-2) as well as markers related to chemoresistance (MGMT, TIMP-1, Lamp-1, MRP1, MDR-1). As spheroids derived in hypoxia were smaller than in normoxia, a set of experiments was included in which the culturing time of hypoxic spheroids was extended to obtain equally sized spheroids. The results showed that expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α was increased in hypoxia, whereas Ki-67 was reduced. Expression of stem cell markers CD133, podoplanin, Bmi-1, and nestin was increased in hypoxia, whereas Sox-2 was increased in SJ-1 only. TIMP-1 and Lamp-1 were increased in both SJ-1 and U87. In conclusion, the tumor cell phenotype related to stemness, and thereby potentially to chemoresistance, se…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11060-010-0357-8

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kolenda, J., Jensen, S. S., Aaberg-Jessen, C., Christensen, K., Andersen, C., Brünner, N., & Kristensen, B. W.
Venue
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2010-09-11
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
43-58
ISSN
  • 0167-594X
  • 1573-7373
Cited by
115
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review