Cited by 161Cancer-related cognitive impairment studiesCancer survivorship and careGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment

A randomized trial on the efficacy of methylphenidate and modafinil for improving cognitive functioning and symptoms in patients with a primary brain tumor

Gehring, K., Patwardhan, S. Y., Collins, R., Groves, M. D., Etzel, C. J., Meyers, C. A., Wefel, J. S.·2012·Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

Limited research is available regarding the efficacy of psychostimulants in treating cognitive function in primary brain tumor patients. An open-label, randomized, pilot trial examined both the general and differential efficacy of 4 weeks of methylphenidate (MPH) and modafinil (MOD) in 24 brain tumor patients. Participants completed cognitive tests and self-report measures of fatigue, sleep disturbance, mood and quality of life at baseline and after 4 weeks.Following stimulant treatment, there was evidence of a beneficial effect on test performance in speed of processing and executive function requiring divided attention. Patients with the greatest deficit in executive function at baseline appeared to derive the greatest benefit following stimulant therapy. Inconsistent, differential effects were found on a measure of attention in favor of MPH and on a measure of processing speed in favor of MOD. There was also evidence of a general beneficial effect on patient-reported measures of fatigue, mood, and quality of life, with no statistically significant differences between treatment arms in these measures over time. The results from this small pilot study should be interpreted with caution, but appear to warrant additional research, in larger study samples, targeting fatigue, processing speed and executive function, and exploring different doses of stimulants. Future studies may also wish to explore the specific patient factors that may be associated with responsiveness to psych…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11060-011-0723-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 161

Authors
Gehring, K., Patwardhan, S. Y., Collins, R., Groves, M. D., Etzel, C. J., Meyers, C. A., & Wefel, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wefel, J. S.
Venue
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2011-10-02
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
165-174
ISSN
  • 0167-594X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7373
OpenAlex
W1978267073
Cited by
161
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuro-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
methylphenidate, modafinil, psychostimulants, primary brain tumors, cognitive impairment, executive function, processing speed, attention, fatigue, sleep disorders, mood, quality of life
MeSH terms
Modafinil, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Benzhydryl Compounds, Brain Neoplasms, Cognition Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glioma, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prognosis, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review