MicroRNAs in cerebrospinal fluid as biomarker for disease course monitoring in primary central nervous system lymphoma
Abstract
Diagnosis of primary lymphomas of the central nervous system (PCNSL) largely depends on histopathology of tumor biopsies. Recently, we identified miRNAs detected in the CSF of PCNSL patients as novel non-invasive biomarkers for this disease. In combined analyses of miR-21, miR-19b, and miR-92 CSF levels, it was possible to differentiate PCNSL from other neurological disorders. In the current study, we first confirmed our previous findings in an enlarged PCNSL cohort (n = 39; sensitivity 97.4 %). Also, we sought to establish the potential role of CSF miRNAs as biomarkers for disease course monitoring. In sequential miRNA measurements in CSF derived from nine patients with different disease courses, an intriguing correlation of miRNA levels and PCNSL status during treatment and/or disease follow-up was demonstrated. Finally, we demonstrated that miRNA levels in serum of PCNSL patients (n = 14) were not elevated as compared to controls. In summary, this study provides the first evidence that CSF miRNAs have the potential as biomarkers for treatment monitoring and disease follow-up of patients with PCNSL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
miR-19b-3p in CSF has been reported as a putative diagnostic marker for glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma.
“In addition, miR-19b-3p in CSF has been reported as a putative diagnostic marker for glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma41.”
From Intra- and Inter-individual Variability of microRNA Levels in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid: Critical Implications for Biomarker Discovery (2017) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yoon, H., Belmonte, K. C., Kasten, T., Bateman, R., & Kim, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13031-w · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baraniskin, A., Kuhnhenn, J., Schlegel, U., Schmiegel, W., Hahn, S., & Schroers, R.
- Affiliations
- Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum (DE)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schroers, Roland
- Venue
- Journal of Neuro-Oncology
- Published
- 2012-06-23
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-244
- ISSN
- 0167-594X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7373
- OpenAlex
- W2035233256
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Neuro-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Keywords
- primary central nervous system lymphoma, non-invasive biomarkers, disease surveillance, miR-21, miR-19b, miR-92, serum microRNA, treatment response
- MeSH terms
- Cell Count, Female, Humans, Lymphoma, Male, RNA, Messenger, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Disease Progression, Statistics, Nonparametric, MicroRNAs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review