Cited by 39Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentPhytochemicals and Medicinal PlantsElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects

Synergistic inhibition of glioma cell proliferation by Withaferin A and tumor treating fields

Open access
Chang, Edwin, Pohling, Christoph, Beygui, Nooshin, Patel, Chirag B., Rosenberg, Jarrett, Ha, Dong Ho, Gambhir, Sanjiv S.·2017·Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal form of brain cancer. Standard therapies are non-specific and often of limited effectiveness; thus, efforts are underway to uncover novel, unorthodox therapies against GBM. In previous studies, we investigated Withaferin A, a steroidal lactone from Ayurvedic medicine that inhibits proliferation in cancers including GBM. Another novel approach, tumor treating fields (TTFields), is thought to disrupt mitotic spindle formation and stymie proliferation of actively dividing cells. We hypothesized that combining TTFields with Withaferin A would synergistically inhibit proliferation in glioblastoma. Human glioblastoma cells (GBM2, GBM39, U87-MG) and human breast adenocarcinoma cells (MDA-MB-231) were isolated from primary tumors. The glioma cell lines were genetically engineered to express firefly luciferase. Proliferative potential was assessed either by bioluminescence imaging or cell counting via hemocytometer. TTFields (4 V/cm) significantly inhibited growth of the four cancer cell lines tested (n = 3 experiments per time point, four measurements per sample, p < 0.02 at least; 2-way ANOVA, control vs. treatment). The combination of Withaferin A (10-100 nM) with TTFields significantly inhibited the growth of the glioma cells to a degree beyond that of Withaferin A or TTFields alone. The interaction of the Withaferin A and TTFields on glioma cells was found to be synergistic in nature (p < 0.01, n = 3 experiments). These findings were validated by both bioluminescence and hemocytometric measurements. The combination of Withaferin A with TTFields represents a novel approach to treat GBM in a manner that is likely better than either treatment alone and that is synergistic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11060-017-2534-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TTFields exposure in conjunction with Withaferin A synergistically inhibited the growth of human glioblastoma cells.

    “Recently we have demonstrated that TTFields exposure, in conjunction with a novel anti-cancer compound Withaferin A, synergistically inhibited the growth of human glioblastoma cells [26].”

    From Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

  • TTFields and Withaferin A have synergistic activity.

    “Such a phenomenon may explain our recent findings of synergistic activity between TTFields and the potential chemotherapeutic agent, Withaferin A [26].”

    From Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

  • TTFields treatment in conjunction with Withaferin A synergistically inhibited the growth of human glioblastoma cells.

    “Recently we have demonstrated that TTFields treatment, in conjunction with a novel anticancer compound Withaferin A, synergistically inhibited the growth of human glioblastoma cells18.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 39

Authors
Chang, E., Pohling, C., Beygui, N., Patel, C. B., Rosenberg, J., Ha, D. H., & Gambhir, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Scripps College (US)
  • Dong-A University Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Gambhir, Sanjiv S.
Venue
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2017-07-05
Volume
134
Issue
2
Pages
259-268
ISSN
  • 0167-594X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7373
OpenAlex
W2731311109
Cited by
39
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuro-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation
  • R25 Translational Neuroscience Training Grant (R25NS065741)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Keywords
glioblastoma, withaferin A, tumor treating fields, combination therapy, synergistic antiproliferative effect, glioma cell proliferation, steroidal lactones, Ayurveda, mitotic spindle disruption, breast adenocarcinoma, bioluminescence imaging
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Antineoplastic Agents, Brain Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Combined Modality Therapy, Doxorubicin, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Glioma, Humans, Temperature, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Luciferases, Firefly, Withanolides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review