Understanding Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: Focus on Decision Making
Abstract
Current approaches to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have suggested that neurobiological abnormalities play a crucial role in the etiology and course of this psychiatric illness. In particular, a fronto-subcortical circuit, including the orbitofrontal cortex, basal ganglia and thalamus appears to be involved in the expression of OCD symptoms. Neuropsychological studies have also shown that patients with OCD show deficits in cognitive abilities that are strictly linked to the functioning of the frontal lobe and its related fronto-subcortical structures, such as executive functioning deficits and insufficient cognitive-behavioral flexibility. This article focuses on decision making, an executive ability that plays a crucial role in many real-life situations, whereby individuals choose between pursuing strategies of action that involve only immediate reward and others based on long-term reward. Although the role of decision-making deficits in the evolution of OCD requires further research, the collected findings have significant implications for understanding the clinical and behavioral heterogeneity that characterizes individuals with OCD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decision-making and learning impairments are core characteristics of a wide range of psychiatric disorders, including MDD, OCD, and schizophrenia, and are linked to their specific symptoms.
“Decision-making and learning impairments are core characteristics of a wide range of psychiatric disorders — such as major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and schizophrenia — and are linked to their specific symptoms.1–9”
From Investigating disorder-specific and transdiagnostic alterations in model-based and model-free decision-making (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 161
- Authors
- Cavedini, P., Gorini, A., & Bellodi, L.
- Affiliations
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Cavedini, Paolo
- Venue
- Neuropsychology Review
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-15
- ISSN
- 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6660
- OpenAlex
- W2066206079
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, decision-making, executive function, orbitofrontal cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, reward processing, long-term reward, neuropsychological deficits, clinical heterogeneity
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Decision Making, Humans, Neurobiology, Neuropsychology, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Problem Solving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review