Cited by 161Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Understanding Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: Focus on Decision Making

Cavedini, Paolo, Gorini, Alessandra, Bellodi, Laura·2006·Neuropsychology Review

Abstract

Current approaches to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have suggested that neurobiological abnormalities play a crucial role in the etiology and course of this psychiatric illness. In particular, a fronto-subcortical circuit, including the orbitofrontal cortex, basal ganglia and thalamus appears to be involved in the expression of OCD symptoms. Neuropsychological studies have also shown that patients with OCD show deficits in cognitive abilities that are strictly linked to the functioning of the frontal lobe and its related fronto-subcortical structures, such as executive functioning deficits and insufficient cognitive-behavioral flexibility. This article focuses on decision making, an executive ability that plays a crucial role in many real-life situations, whereby individuals choose between pursuing strategies of action that involve only immediate reward and others based on long-term reward. Although the role of decision-making deficits in the evolution of OCD requires further research, the collected findings have significant implications for understanding the clinical and behavioral heterogeneity that characterizes individuals with OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11065-006-9001-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decision-making and learning impairments are core characteristics of a wide range of psychiatric disorders, including MDD, OCD, and schizophrenia, and are linked to their specific symptoms.

    “Decision-making and learning impairments are core characteristics of a wide range of psychiatric disorders — such as major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and schizophrenia — and are linked to their specific symptoms.1–9”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 98 · Cited by 161

Authors
Cavedini, P., Gorini, A., & Bellodi, L.
Affiliations
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
Corresponding author
Cavedini, Paolo
Venue
Neuropsychology Review
Published
2006-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
3-15
ISSN
  • 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6660
OpenAlex
W2066206079
Cited by
161
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, decision-making, executive function, orbitofrontal cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, reward processing, long-term reward, neuropsychological deficits, clinical heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Brain, Decision Making, Humans, Neurobiology, Neuropsychology, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review