Cited by 104Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

a comparison of structural brain imaging findings in autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Dougherty, Chase C., Evans, David W., Myers, Scott M., Moore, Gregory J., Michael, Andrew M.·2016·Neuropsychology Review

Abstract

ASD and ADHD are regarded as distinct disorders in the current DSM-5. However, recent research and the RDoC initiative are recognizing considerable overlap in the clinical presentation of ASD, ADHD, and other neurodevelopmental disorders. In spite of numerous neuroimaging findings in ASD and ADHD, the extent to which either of the above views are supported remains equivocal. Here we compare structural MRI and DTI literature in ASD and ADHD. Our main findings reveal both distinct and shared neural features. Distinct expressions were in total brain volume (ASD: increased volume, ADHD: decreased volume), amygdala (ASD: overgrowth, ADHD: normal), and internal capsule (ASD: unclear, ADHD: reduced FA in DTI). Considerable overlap was noted in the corpus callosum and cerebellum (lower volume in structural MRI and decreased FA in DTI), and superior longitudinal fasciculus (reduced FA in DTI). In addition, we identify brain regions which have not been studied in depth and require more research. We discuss relationships between brain features and symptomatology. We conclude by addressing limitations of current neuroimaging research and offer approaches that account for clinical heterogeneity to better distinguish brain-behavior relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11065-015-9300-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 163 · Cited by 104

Authors
Dougherty, C. C., Evans, D. W., Myers, S. M., Moore, G. J., & Michael, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute (US)
  • Bucknell University (US)
  • Geisinger Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dougherty, Chase C.
Venue
Neuropsychology Review
Published
2015-10-19
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
25-43
ISSN
  • 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6660
OpenAlex
W1848922716
Cited by
104
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, structural neuroimaging, diffusion tensor imaging, brain volume, corpus callosum, cerebellum, superior longitudinal fasciculus, fractional anisotropy, internal capsule, Research Domain Criteria, brain-behavior relationship, clinical heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review