Efficacy of invasive and non-invasive brain modulation interventions for addiction
Open accessAbstract
It is important to find new treatments for addiction due to high relapse rates despite current interventions and due to expansion of the field with non-substance related addictive behaviors. Neuromodulation may provide a new type of treatment for addiction since it can directly target abnormalities in neurocircuits. We review literature on five neuromodulation techniques investigated for efficacy in substance related and behavioral addictions: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), (repetitive) transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), EEG, fMRI neurofeedback and deep brain stimulation (DBS) and additionally report on effects of these interventions on addiction-related cognitive processes. While rTMS and tDCS, mostly applied at the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, show reductions in immediate craving for various addictive substances, placebo-responses are high and long-term outcomes are understudied. The lack in well-designed EEG-neurofeedback studies despite decades of investigation impedes conclusions about its efficacy. Studies investigating fMRI neurofeedback are new and show initial promising effects on craving, but future trials are needed to investigate long-term and behavioral effects. Case studies report prolonged abstinence of opioids or alcohol with ventral striatal DBS but difficulties with patient inclusion may hinder larger, controlled trials. DBS in neuropsychiatric patients modulates brain circuits involved in reward processing, extinction and negative-reinforcement that are also relevant for addiction. To establish the potential of neuromodulation for addiction, more randomized controlled trials are needed that also investigate treatment duration required for long-term abstinence and potential synergy with other addiction interventions. Finally, future advancement may be expected from tailoring neuromodulation techniques to specific patient (neurocognitive) profiles.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been inconsistent findings related to the efficacy of tDCS for the treatment of SUD.
“While there have been inconsistent findings related to the efficacy of tDCS for the treatment of SUD [101], further investigation is warranted with particular emphasis on methodological approaches and long term outcomes.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 139 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Luigjes, J., Segrave, R., de Joode, N., Figee, M., & Denys, D.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Monash University (AU)
- Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Luigjes, Judy
- Venue
- Neuropsychology Review
- Published
- 2018-12-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-138
- ISSN
- 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6660
- PMC
- PMC6499746
- OpenAlex
- W2903758575
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 139
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Academic Medical Center
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- addiction treatment, neuromodulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, neurofeedback, fMRI neurofeedback, deep brain stimulation, substance use disorders, behavioral addiction, craving reduction, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, opioid use disorder, alcoholism, abstinence, placebo response, reward processing, extinction, negative reinforcement
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Clinical Trials as Topic, Electroencephalography, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Behavior, Addictive, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Deep Brain Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Neurofeedback, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review