Systematic review and meta-analyses of word production abilities in dysfunction of the basal ganglia: Stroke, small vessel disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease
Open accessAbstract
Clinical populations with basal ganglia pathologies may present with language production impairments, which are often described in combination with comprehension measures or attributed to motor, memory, or processing-speed problems. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we studied word production in four (vascular and non-vascular) pathologies of the basal ganglia: stroke affecting the basal ganglia, small vessel disease, Parkinson's disease, and Huntington's disease. We compared scores of these clinical populations with those of matched cognitively unimpaired adults on four well-established production tasks, namely picture naming, category fluency, letter fluency, and past-tense verb inflection. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and PsycINFO with terms for basal ganglia structures, basal ganglia disorders and language production tasks. A total of 114 studies were included, containing results for one or more of the tasks of interest. For each pathology and task combination, effect sizes (Hedges' g) were extracted comparing patient versus control groups. For all four populations, performance was consistently worse than that of cognitively unimpaired adults across the four language production tasks (p-values < 0.010). Given that performance in picture naming and verb inflection across all pathologies was quantified in terms of accuracy, our results suggest that production impairments cannot be fully explained by motor or processing-speed deficits. Our review shows that while language production difficulties in these clinical populations are not negligible, more evidence is necessary to determine the exact mechanism that leads to these deficits and whether this mechanism is the same across different pathologies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Systematic reviews show that speech and language studies across neurodegenerative diseases span fewer than 20 languages, most tested in only a handful of papers.
“Also, as shown by systematic reviews, speech and language studies across neurodegenerative diseases span fewer than 20 languages, most of them tested in only a handful of papers. 4,5,47,81-83”
From Speech and language markers of neurodegeneration: a call for global equity (2023) · cites this paper as [82]
English has been targeted by 65% of verbal production studies on Parkinson's disease and by 74% of speech and language studies on behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.
“Furthermore, English has been targeted by 65% of verbal production studies on Parkinson's disease 82 and by 74% of speech and language stud ies on behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia 6”
From Speech and language markers of neurodegeneration: a call for global equity (2023) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 194 · Cited by 27
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Covidence systematic review software. (n.d.). Veritas Health Innova- tion. www.covidence.org
- n160. · DOI · Paper page
- Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the meta- for package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48.
- Wallesch, C. W., & Papagno, C. (1988). Subcortical aphasia. In F. C. Rose, R. Whurr, & M. A. Wyke (Eds.), Aphasia. Whurr Publishers.
- Authors
- Camerino, I., Ferreira, J., Vonk, J. M., Kessels, R. P. C., de Leeuw, F.-E., Roelofs, A., Copland, D., & Piai, V.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ferreira, João
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuropsychology Review
- Published
- 2022-12-24
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6660
- OpenAlex
- W4312115739
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 194
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024.001.006)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Neurological and metabolic disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- word production, basal ganglia dysfunction, stroke, cerebral small vessel disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, picture naming, semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, motor impairment, processing speed
- MeSH terms
- Basal Ganglia, Humans, Huntington Disease, Language, Parkinson Disease, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review