The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
Efron, B. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552 · Cited by 17,602
(2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-6857-6.x5000-0 · Cited by 4,961
Dubnick, M. J. (1998) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · Cited by 3,808
Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States
Mileti, D. S. (1999) · Cited by 2,072
Maidment, D. R. (1993) · Cited by 2,063
Forensic Entomology: An Introduction
Higley, L. G., & Huntington, T. E. (2009) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1603/033.046.0538 · Cited by 1,580
A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation
Bates, P. D., & De Roo, A. P. J. (2000) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00278-x · Cited by 1,460
Frequency analysis of extreme events
Stedinger, J. R. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 961
Generating Surface Models of Population Using Dasymetric Mapping
Mennis, J. (2003) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/0033-0124.10042 · Cited by 578
A mathematical model for flood loss estimation
Dutta, D., Herath, S., & Musiake, K. (2003) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00084-2 · Cited by 544
Cited by
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,456
A framework for global river flood risk assessments
Winsemius, H. C., Van Beek, L. P. H., Jongman, B., Ward, P. J., & Bouwman, A. (2013) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-17-1871-2013 · Cited by 448
Towards understanding the dynamic behaviour of floodplains as human-water systems
Di Baldassarre, G., Kooy, M., Kemerink, J. S., & Brandimarte, L. (2013) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-17-3235-2013 · Cited by 300
Flood risk assessment for informal settlements
De Risi, R., Jalayer, F., De Paola, F., Iervolino, I., Giugni, M., Topa, M. E., Mbuya, E., Kyessi, A., Manfredi, G., & Gasparini, P. (2013) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0749-0 · Cited by 156
Cotugno, A., Smith, V., Baker, T., & Srinivasan, R. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13193806 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Apel, H., Aronica, G. T., Kreibich, H., & Thieken, A. H.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards
- Published
- 2008-09-12
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-98
- ISSN
- 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0840
- OpenAlex
- W2006247014
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8
- The paper
- Apel, H., Aronica, G. T., Kreibich, H., & Thieken, A. H. (2009). Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
