The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters
Open accessAbstract
Cascading effects and cascading disasters are emerging fields of scientific research. The widespread diffusion of functional networks increases the complexity of interdependent systems and their vulnerability to large-scale disruptions. Although in recent years studies of interconnections and chain effects have improved significantly, cascading phenomena are often associated with the “toppling domino metaphor”, or with high-impact, low-probability events. This paper aimed to support a paradigm shift in the state of the art by proposing a new theoretical approach to cascading events in terms of their root causes and lack of predictability. By means of interdisciplinary theory building, we demonstrate how cascades reflect the ways in which panarchies collapse. We suggest that the vulnerability of critical infrastructure may orientate the progress of events in relation to society’s feedback loops, rather than merely being an effect of natural triggers. Our conclusions point to a paradigm shift in the preparedness phase that could include escalation points and social nodes, but that also reveals a brand new field of research for disaster scholars.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821
Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies
(2001) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/37.969131 · Cited by 2,851
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Helbing, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12047 · Cited by 1,281
Cited by
How do natural hazards cascade to cause disasters?
AghaKouchak, A., Huning, L. S., Chiang, F., Sadegh, M., Vahedifard, F., Mazdiyasni, O., Moftakhari, H., & Mallakpour, I. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06783-6 · Cited by 282
Climate change impacts on urban sanitation: a systematic review and failure mode analysis
Hyde-Smith, L., Zhan, Z., Roelich, K., Mdee, A., & Evans, B. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c07424 · Cited by 67
Securing SCADA-based Critical Infrastructures: Challenges and Open Issues
Tariq, N., Asim, M., & Khan, F. A. (2019) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.08.086 · Cited by 56
Kabir, M. E., & Kamruzzaman, P. (2022) · Journal of South Asian Development · doi:10.1177/09731741221078741 · Cited by 24
Cascading Events, Technology and the Floods Directive: future challenges
Pescaroli, G., & Nones, M. (2016) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20160707003 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards
- Published
- 2016-02-12
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 175-192
- ISSN
- 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0840
- OpenAlex
- W2261084531
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11069-016-2186-3
- The paper
- Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2016). Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2186-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.