The evaluation of the mediation role of life engagement in resilience and trauma levels of individuals experiencing the earthquake in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the mediation role of life engagement in resilience and trauma levels of individuals experiencing the earthquake on February 6, 2023 in the city of Kahramanmaraş in Türkiye. The sample of this descriptive and correlational study included 1406 individuals. The questionnaire data was obtained through Google Forms and other data collection tools were Socio-demographic Information Form, Trauma Level Determination Scale, Short Resilience Scale and Life Engagement Scale. To analyse the data, frequency (percentage, arithmetic mean) and correlation analyses were used. Depending on the findings of the study, the resilience and trauma levels were negatively correlated, whereas the resilience and life engagement levels were positively correlated. Furthermore, the life engagement levels were negatively correlated with trauma levels while they were positively correlated with resilience. It was found that the life engagement played an mediation role in resilience and trauma levels of individuals experiencing the earthquake in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye. In this study, we found that the life engagement has an important role in resilience and trauma levels of individuals. We are of the opinion that the findings of this study might help researchers and conductors to plan and perform effective strategies for post-impact phase of an earthquake.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Life engagement partially mediated the association between resilience and trauma severity (β resilience→engagement = 0.31; β engagement→trauma = −0.22).
“Life engagement partially mediated the association between resilience and trauma severity (β resilience→engagement = 0.31; β engagement→trauma = −0.22).”
From Coping strategies and psychological outcomes following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a systematic review with meta-analytic synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Resilience was measured as a dispositional trait in some studies and as a coping-related process in others.
“For instance, resilience was measured as a dispositional trait in some studies and as a coping-related process in others [cf. (37, 38)]”
From Coping strategies and psychological outcomes following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a systematic review with meta-analytic synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.
Masten, A. S. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.227 · Cited by 8,497 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Çınaroğlu, M., & Yılmazer, E. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1776931 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Özmaya, E., Erkoç, B., Kalaycı, S., Uzun, S., & Lotfi, S.
- Affiliations
- Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University (TR)
- Gümüşhane University (TR)
- Istanbul Medipol University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Uzun, Sevda
- Venue
- Natural Hazards
- Published
- 2025-05-27
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 14787-14798
- ISSN
- 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0840
- OpenAlex
- W4410791167
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Natural Hazards (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Gumushane University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Keywords
- life engagement, resilience, trauma, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes, mediating effect, disaster victims, earthquake survivors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review