Cited by 61Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityChaos control and synchronization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A novel chaos-based post-processing for TRNG

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11071-015-1981-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Koç, Ç.: Cryptographic Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2009) · DOI
  2. Özkaynak, F.: Cryptographically secure random number generator with chaotic additional input. Nonlinear Dyn. (2014). doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1591-y · DOI
  3. Yoo, S.-K., Karakoyunlu, D., Birand, B., Sunar, B.: Improving the robustness of ring oscillator TRNGs. TRETS 3(2), 9 (2010)
  4. Davies, R.B. : Exclusive OR (XOR) and Hardware Random Number Generators. pp. 1–11, 28 Feb 2002. http://webnz.com/robert
  5. Suresh, V.B., Burleson, W.P. : Entropy extraction in metastability-based TRNG. Hardware-oriented security and trust (HOST). In: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 135–140 (13–14 June 2010) · DOI
  6. Dichtl, M.: Bad and good ways of post-processing biased physical random numbers. Fast Softw. Encryption 4593, 137–152 (2007) · DOI
  7. Sunar, B., Martin, W.J., Stinson, D.R.: A Provably secure true random generator with built-in tolerance to active attacks. In: IEEE Transaction On Computers, vol. 56, No.1 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kohlbrenner, P., Gaj, K. : An embedded true random number generator for FPGAs. International symposium on field programmable gate arrays. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM/SIGDA 12th international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays, pp. 71–78, ACM Press, New York (2004) · DOI
  9. Golic, J.D.: New methods for digital generation and postprocessing of random data. IEEE Trans. Comput. 55(10), 1217–1229 (2006) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Schellekens, D., Preneel, B., Verbauwhede : FPGA vendor agnostic true random number generator. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL’06) (2006), IEEE, pp. 1–6 (2006) · DOI
  11. Özkaynak, F., Özer, A.B., Yavuz, S.: Cryptanalysis of a novel image encryption scheme based on improved hyperchaotic sequences. Opt. Commun. 285(24), 4946–4948 (2012) · DOI
  12. Özkaynak, F., Özer, A.B.: A method for designing strong S-boxes based on chaotic Lorenz system. Phys. Lett. A 374(36), 3733–3738 (2010) · DOI
  13. Mirzaei, O., Yaghoobi, M., Irani, H.: A new image encryption method: parallel sub-image encryption with hyper chaos. Nonlinear Dyn. 67(1), 557–566 (2012) · DOI
  14. Tuncer, T., Avaroğlu, E., Türk, M., Özer, A.B.: Implementation of non-periodic sampling true random number generator on FPGA. J. Microelectron. Electron. Compon. Mater. 44(4), 296–302 (2014)
  15. Avaroğlu, E., Tuncer, T., Özer, A.B., Türk, M.: A new method for hybrid pseudo random number generator. J. Microelectron. Electron. Compon. Mater. 4(4), 303–311 (2014)
  16. Alatas, B., Akin, E., Özer, A.B.: Kaotik Haritalı Parçacık Sürü Optimizasyon Algoritmaları. XII. Elektrik Elektronik Bilgisayar Biyomedikal Mühendisliği Ulusal Kongresi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eskişehir (2007)
  17. Tuncer T., Celik, V. : Hybrid PRNG based on logistic map. In: Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), 2013 21st, pp. 1–4 (2013) · DOI
  18. Benìtez, R., Bolos, V.J., Ramìrez, M.E.: A wavelet-based tool for studying non-periodicity. Comput. Math. Appl. 60, 634 (2010) · DOI
  19. Akhshani, A., Akhavan, A., Mobaraki, A., Lim, S.-C., Hassan, Z.: Pseudo random number generator based on quantum chaotic map. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 19, 101–111 (2014) · DOI
  20. Avaroğlu, E., Özer, A.B., Türk, M.: İstatistiki Uygulamalar Için Kaos Tabanli Yeni Bir Rasgele Sayi Üreteci, 2. Uluslararası Karmaşık Dinamik Sistemler ve Uygulamaları Çalıştayı. Işık Üniversitesi, Istanbul (2013)
  21. L’Ecuyer P., R. Simard, TestU01: A C Library for Empirical Testing of Random Number Generators ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 33, article 22, 2007 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Avaroğlu, E., Tuncer, T., Özer, A. B., Ergen, B., & Türk, M.
Affiliations
  • Inonu University (TR)
  • Fırat University (TR)
Corresponding author
Avaroğlu, Erdinç
Venue
Nonlinear Dynamics
Published
2015-02-26
Volume
81
Issue
1-2
Pages
189-199
ISSN
  • 0924-090X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-269X
OpenAlex
W1995415405
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nonlinear Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace - FIRAT (Fırat University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
true random number generator, logistic map, radio-over-fiber, statistical randomness testing, NIST SP 800-22, TestU01, FPGA implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review