Cited by 81Chaos control and synchronizationMathematical Dynamics and FractalsAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems

Four-dimensional autonomous dynamical systems with conservative flows: two-case study

Cang, Shijian, Wu, Aiguo, Wang, Zenghui, Chen, Zengqiang·2017·Nonlinear Dynamics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11071-017-3599-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cang, S., Wu, A., Wang, Z., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • University of South Africa (ZA)
  • Nankai University (CN)
Corresponding author
Cang, Shijian
Venue
Nonlinear Dynamics
Published
2017-06-21
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
2495-2508
ISSN
  • 0924-090X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-269X
OpenAlex
W2721651821
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nonlinear Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Keywords
four-dimensional autonomous system, conservative chaotic systems, quasi-periodic flow, Lyapunov spectrum, bifurcation diagrams, Poincaré sections, circuit implementation, Multisim

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review