Cited by 58Control Systems and IdentificationAdvanced Control Systems DesignStatistical and numerical algorithms

Nonlinear system identification using fractional Hammerstein–Wiener models

Hammar, Karima, Djamah, Tounsia, Bettayeb, Maamar·2019·Nonlinear Dynamics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11071-019-05331-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Hammar, K., Djamah, T., & Bettayeb, M.
Affiliations
Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou (DZ)
Corresponding author
Hammar, Karima
Venue
Nonlinear Dynamics
Published
2019-11
Volume
98
Issue
3
Pages
2327-2338
ISSN
  • 0924-090X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-269X
OpenAlex
W2984144322
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nonlinear Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
Keywords
nonlinear system identification, fractional-order systems, Hammerstein-Wiener model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review