CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsFoucault, Power, and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Therapy and the Punctual Self: Using an Ascetical Framework to Critique Approaches to Psychotherapy

Stewart-Sicking, Joseph A.·2015·Pastoral Psychology
DOI 10.1007/s11089-013-0588-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11089-013-0588-7

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stewart-Sicking, J. A.
Venue
Pastoral Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-12-22
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
111-122
ISSN
  • 0031-2789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6679
DOI
10.1007/s11089-013-0588-7
OpenAlex
W2040519134
Cited by
5
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Pastoral Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, Charles Taylor, Michel Foucault, technologies of the self, care of the self, Beck's cognitive therapy, spirituality in psychotherapy, perfectionism, naturalism, asceticism, modernity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review