CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 147Pharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pharmaceutical care, European developments in concepts, implementation, teaching, and research: a review

Mil, J. W. Foppe, Schulz, Martin, Tromp, Th. F. J. Dick·2004·Pharmacy World & Science
DOI 10.1007/s11096-004-2849-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article discusses the concept of pharmaceutical care especially from the European perspective. It tries to clarify the current status of pharmaceutical care research and implementation, and if and how it can be part of the practice of pharmacy. Pharmaceutical care basically means improving the medication use process in order to improve outcomes, including the patients' quality of life, and that involves a focus change for pharmacy from product to patient. This change in focus also implies that the pharmacy curriculum should be adapted, in order for the pharmacist to be able to acquire new knowledge and skills. In most countries this change currently is taking place but not in very deliberate or structured manner. Some basic decisions have to be made, in order to guarantee that every patient receives pharmaceutical care when needed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11096-004-2849-0

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. RL Mikael, 1975, Am J Hosp Pharm, 32, 567
  2. CD Hepler, 1990, Am J Hosp Pharm, 47, 533
  3. Anonymous, 1997, Int Pharm J, 11, 69
  4. RJ Cipolle, 1998, A New Professional Practice. Pharmaceutical Care Practice
  5. Anonymous, 1999, Pharm J, 263, 464
  6. CD Hepler, 1996, Pharmaceutical Care
  7. Hepler CD. The Pharmacist in the medication use process (an Introduction to Pharmaceutical Care). In: Hepler CD, editor. Pharmaceutical Care in Community Practice. Proceedings of the Section of Community Pharmacists. World Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1993, Tokyo, Japan. FIP, Hillerod, Denmark, 1995.
  8. JL Marco, 2002, Pharm Care Esp, 4, 286
  9. Haugbølle L Stig, 2002, Pat Educ Couns, 47, 282
  10. HM Bell, 2000, J Soc Admin Pharm, 17, 119
  11. Roughead L, Semple S, Vitry A. The value proposition of pharmacist professional services in the community setting. A systematic review of the literature 1990?2002 at: www.guild.org/public/researchdocs/reportvalueservices.pdf. (6 February 2004).
  12. W McLean, 1998, Can Pharm J, 131, 34
  13. M Schaefer, 1998, Pharm Ztg, 143, 4446
  14. DT Saanum, 1996, A study of errors and insufficient information on prescriptions. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 116, 2325
  15. F Fernández-Llimós, 2002, El Farmacéutico, 290, 83
  16. J Corbett, 1995, Pharm J, 255, 555
  17. de Vries CS. Collaboration in healthcare [Dissertation] University of Groningen, 1998. ISBN 90-367-0978-4.
  18. B Sondergaard, 2000, Ugeskr Laeger, 162, 480
  19. van Mil JWF. Results of pharmaceutical care in asthma, the TOM study. In: pharmaceutical care, the future of pharmacy [Dissertation] Groningen 1999. ISBN 90-9013367-4.
  20. TJ Granger-Rousseau, 1997, J Appl Ther, 1, 145
  21. JA Garcão, 2002, J Am Pharm Assoc, 42, 858
  22. Tromp ThFJ (Ed.). Continuing professional development. Improving patient outcomes by pharmacists? interventions. Outcomes in day-to-day practice. Proceedings of the Community Pharmacy Section. FIP, Barcelona, Spain, September 9?10, 1999.
  23. CM Kozma, 1993, Clin Ther, 15, 1121
  24. 1999, Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Outcomes Measurement in Pharmaceutical Care
  25. HM Bell, 1998, J Soc Adm Pharm, 15, 284
  26. C Rossing, 2001, J Soc Adm Pharm, 19, 55
  27. R Kinget, 2000, Int Pharm J, 14, 4
  28. 1999, Report of the Task Force for Implementing Pharmaceutical Care. Groningen/Kampen: European Association of Faculties of Pharmacy
  29. EW Sørensen, 2003, Chronic Ill, 7, 12
  30. S Himstedt, 2004, Pharmazeutische dienstleistung für die patienten [Family pharmacy. Pharmaceutical services for patients]. Pharm Ztg, 149, 1522
  31. EW Sørensen, 2003, Participatory action research as an implementation strategy [Poster Abstract]. PCNE Working Conferencve: Pharmaceutical Care Research-The Next Generation
  32. Neto AC Almeida De, 2003, Aust J Pharm, 84, 314
  33. F Mil Van, 2003, Pharm Weekbl, 138, 865
  34. H Herborg, 1995, Int Pharm J, 9, 148

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Related

Metadata

Authors
Mil, J. W. F., Schulz, M., & Tromp, T. F. J. D.
Affiliations
Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists (DE)
ORCID
Schulz, Martin
Venue
Pharmacy World & Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-12
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
303-311
ISSN
  • 0167-6555 (ISSN-L)
  • 0928-1231
  • 1573-739X
DOI
10.1007/s11096-004-2849-0
OpenAlex
W2017154155
Cited by
145
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Pharmacy World & Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
pharmaceutical care, medication process, pharmacy curriculum, pharmacy education, quality of life
MeSH terms
Education, Pharmacy, Europe, Pharmaceutical Services, Pharmacists, Research, Professional Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review