An evaluation of Australian pharmacist’s attitudes on expanding their prescribing role
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the views of Australian pharmacists on expanded pharmacist prescribing roles and identify important drivers and barriers to its implementation. Setting Pharmacists in Australia. Method Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire distributed nationally to a random sample of pharmacists either directly, or in the case of one state, via community pharmacies. One-way ANOVA and ϰ(2) testing were used to identify significant associations. Factor analysis was conducted to pool variables and the derived factors were subjected to regression analysis. Main outcome measures Perceptions of Australian pharmacists on expanded prescribing and the relationships between variables derived. Results A total of 2592 questionnaires were distributed and a response rate of 40.4% was achieved (n = 1049). Of the respondents 83.9% strongly agreed/agreed to an expanded prescribing role for pharmacists and 97.1% reported they would need further training. Of the respondents 896 agreed that pharmacists should engage in supplementary, independent prescribing or both. Of these 69.1% preferred only supplementary prescribing, 3.3% independent prescribing and 27.4% both models. Both models were found to be positive predictors of expanding pharmaceutical services through prescribing (P < 0.001) with supplementary prescribing showing a stronger association (β = 0.52 vs. β = 0.18). Pharmacists' opinion based on their current perceptions of their clients was an important predictor in expanding pharmaceutical services through prescribing (P = 0.005). Inadequate training in patient assessment, diagnosis and monitoring were the strongest barriers to expanded pharmacist prescribing (P < 0.001). Conclusions The majority of Australian pharmacists supported an expanded pharmacist prescribing role. Support for supplementary was stronger than independent prescribing. Pharmacists acknowledged that they would need further training to perform such roles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community pharmacy practice in Australia includes provision of drug information and clinical interventions.
“Community pharmacy practice in Australia includes provision of drug information and clinical interventions [16,17].”
From From “retailers” to health care providers: Transforming the role of community pharmacists in chronic disease management (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Hoti, K., Sunderland, B., Hughes, J., & Parsons, R.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hoti, Kreshnik
- Venue
- Pharmacy World & Science
- Published
- 2010-08-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 610-621
- ISSN
- 0167-6555 (ISSN-L)
- 0928-1231
- 1573-739X
- OpenAlex
- W2037107177
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Pharmacy World & Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Curtin University of Technology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- pharmacist prescribing, supplementary prescribing, independent prescribing, pharmacist attitudes, barriers to prescribing, pharmacist training needs, community pharmacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Pharmaceutical Services, Pharmacists, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prescription Drugs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review