Cited by 52Pharmacy and Medical PracticesNursing Roles and PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

An evaluation of Australian pharmacist’s attitudes on expanding their prescribing role

Hoti, Kreshnik, Sunderland, Bruce, Hughes, Jeffery, Parsons, Richard·2010·Pharmacy World & Science

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the views of Australian pharmacists on expanded pharmacist prescribing roles and identify important drivers and barriers to its implementation. Setting Pharmacists in Australia. Method Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire distributed nationally to a random sample of pharmacists either directly, or in the case of one state, via community pharmacies. One-way ANOVA and ϰ(2) testing were used to identify significant associations. Factor analysis was conducted to pool variables and the derived factors were subjected to regression analysis. Main outcome measures Perceptions of Australian pharmacists on expanded prescribing and the relationships between variables derived. Results A total of 2592 questionnaires were distributed and a response rate of 40.4% was achieved (n = 1049). Of the respondents 83.9% strongly agreed/agreed to an expanded prescribing role for pharmacists and 97.1% reported they would need further training. Of the respondents 896 agreed that pharmacists should engage in supplementary, independent prescribing or both. Of these 69.1% preferred only supplementary prescribing, 3.3% independent prescribing and 27.4% both models. Both models were found to be positive predictors of expanding pharmaceutical services through prescribing (P < 0.001) with supplementary prescribing showing a stronger association (β = 0.52 vs. β = 0.18). Pharmacists' opinion based on their current perceptions of their clients was an important predictor in expanding pharmaceutical services through prescribing (P = 0.005). Inadequate training in patient assessment, diagnosis and monitoring were the strongest barriers to expanded pharmacist prescribing (P < 0.001). Conclusions The majority of Australian pharmacists supported an expanded pharmacist prescribing role. Support for supplementary was stronger than independent prescribing. Pharmacists acknowledged that they would need further training to perform such roles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11096-010-9400-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 52

Authors
Hoti, K., Sunderland, B., Hughes, J., & Parsons, R.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hoti, Kreshnik
Venue
Pharmacy World & Science
Published
2010-08-04
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
610-621
ISSN
  • 0167-6555 (ISSN-L)
  • 0928-1231
  • 1573-739X
OpenAlex
W2037107177
Cited by
52
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacy World & Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Curtin University of Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
pharmacist prescribing, supplementary prescribing, independent prescribing, pharmacist attitudes, barriers to prescribing, pharmacist training needs, community pharmacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Pharmaceutical Services, Pharmacists, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prescription Drugs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review