Commonsense concepts of phenomenal consciousness: does anyone care about functional zombies?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It remains unclear how folk conceptions of phenomenality correspond to the relevant philosophical constructs.
“Beyond issues of measurement, it remains unclear how folk conceptions of phenomenality correspond to the relevant philosophical constructs (Huebner 2010, Talbot 2012, Peressini 2014).”
From Folk psychological attributions of consciousness to large language models (2024) · cites this paper as Huebner 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Huebner, B.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huebner, Bryce
- ORCID
- Huebner, Bryce
- Venue
- Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
- Published
- 2009-04-14
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-155
- ISSN
- 1568-7759 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8676
- OpenAlex
- W2094423012
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- phenomenal consciousness, phenomenal states, pain, emotions, moral concern, mental states, theory of consciousness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
