The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Herbivore induction of the glucosinolate–myrosinase defense system: major trends, biochemical bases and ecological significance
Open accessAbstract
Like many other plant defense compounds, glucosinolates are present constitutively in plant tissues, but are also induced to higher levels by herbivore attack. Of the major glucosinolate types, indolic glucosinolates are most frequently induced regardless of the type of herbivore involved. Over 90% of previous studies found that herbivore damage to glucosinolate-containing plants led to an increased accumulation of indolic glucosinolates at levels ranging up to 20-fold. Aliphatic and aromatic glucosinolates are also commonly induced by herbivores, though usually at much lower magnitudes than indolic glucosinolates, and aliphatic and aromatic glucosinolates may even undergo declines following herbivory. The glucosinolate defense system also requires another partner, the enzyme myrosinase, to hydrolyze the parent glucosinolates into biologically active derivatives. Much less is known about myrosinase induction after herbivory compared to glucosinolate induction, and no general trends are evident. However, it is clear that insect feeding stimulates the formation of various myrosinase associated proteins whose function is not yet understood. The biochemical mechanism of glucosinolate induction involves a jasmonate signaling cascade that leads eventually to increases in the transcript levels of glucosinolate biosynthetic genes. Several recently described transcription factors controlling glucosinolate biosynthesis are activated by herbivory or wounding. Herbivore induction of glucosinolates has sometimes been demonstrated to increase protection against subsequent herbivore attack, but more research is needed to evaluate the costs and benefits of this phenomenon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemical world of crucivores: lures, treats and traps
Renwick, J. A. A. (2002) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.2002.00988.x · Cited by 170
Cited by
Plant Defense Against Herbivores: Chemical Aspects
Mithöfer, A., & Boland, W. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854 · Cited by 1,610
Diamondback Moth Ecology and Management: Problems, Progress, and Prospects
Furlong, M. J., Wright, D. J., & Dosdall, L. M. (2013) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153605 · Cited by 930
Metadata
- Authors
- Textor, S., & Gershenzon, J.
- Venue
- Phytochemistry Reviews
- Published
- 2008-11-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-170
- ISSN
- 1568-7767 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-980X
- OpenAlex
- W2142767735
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Herbivore induction of the glucosinolate–myrosinase defense system: major trends, biochemical bases and ecological significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11101-008-9117-1
- The paper
- Textor, S., & Gershenzon, J. (2009). Herbivore induction of the glucosinolate–myrosinase defense system: major trends, biochemical bases and ecological significance. Phytochemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-008-9117-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.