The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How plants handle multiple stresses: hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory
Open accessAbstract
Adaptive plant responses to specific abiotic stresses or biotic agents are fine-tuned by a network of hormonal signaling cascades, including abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene, jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid. Moreover, hormonal cross-talk modulates plant responses to abiotic stresses and defenses against insect herbivores when they occur simultaneously. How such interactions affect plant responses under multiple stresses, however, is less understood, even though this may frequently occur in natural environments. Here, we review our current knowledge on how hormonal signaling regulates abiotic stress responses and defenses against insects, and discuss the few recent studies that attempted to dissect hormonal interactions occurring under simultaneous abiotic stress and herbivory. Based on this we hypothesize that drought stress enhances insect resistance due to synergistic interactions between JA and ABA signaling. Responses to flooding or waterlogging involve ethylene signaling, which likely reduces plant resistance to chewing herbivores due to its negative cross-talk with JA. However, the outcome of interactions between biotic and abiotic stress signaling is often plant and/or insect species-dependent and cannot simply be predicted based on general knowledge on the involvement of signaling pathways in single stress responses. More experimental data on non-model plant and insect species are needed to reveal general patterns and better understand the molecular mechanisms allowing plants to optimize their responses in complex environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barker, T. J., Bashmakov, I., Bernstein, L., Bogner, J. R., Bosch, P. C., Dave, R., Davidson, O., Fisher, B. S., Grubb, M. J., Gupta, S. K., et al. (2007) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 9,160
Abscisic Acid: Emergence of a Core Signaling Network
Cutler, S. R., Rodriguez, P. L., Finkelstein, R. R., & Abrams, S. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122 · Cited by 3,151
Hormonal Modulation of Plant Immunity
Pieterse, C. M. J., Van der Does, D., Zamioudis, C., Leon-Reyes, A., & Van Wees, S. C. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055 · Cited by 2,998
Wasternack, C., & Hause, B. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mct067 · Cited by 2,629
Abiotic and biotic stress combinations
Suzuki, N., Rivero, R. M., Shulaev, V., Blumwald, E., & Mittler, R. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12797 · Cited by 2,153
ROS as key players in plant stress signalling
Baxter, A., Mittler, R., & Suzuki, N. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ert375 · Cited by 1,933
The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field
Atkinson, N. J., & Urwin, P. E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ers100 · Cited by 1,880
Growth–Defense Tradeoffs in Plants: A Balancing Act to Optimize Fitness
Huot, B., Yao, J., Montgomery, B. L., & He, S. Y. (2014) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/ssu049 · Cited by 1,836
Lorenzo, O., Piqueras, R., Sánchez-Serrano, J. J., & Solano, R. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.007468 · Cited by 1,405
Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants
Peleg, Z., & Blumwald, E. (2011) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.001 · Cited by 1,359
Cited by
Systems Biology of Plant-Microbiome Interactions
Rodriguez, P. A., Rothballer, M., Chowdhury, S. P., Nussbaumer, T., Gutjahr, C., & Falter-Braun, P. (2019) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2019.05.006 · Cited by 489
Napier, J. D., Heckman, R. W., & Juenger, T. E. (2023) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koac322 · Cited by 158
Plants have different strategies to defend against air pollutants
Oksanen, E., & Kontunen-Soppela, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health · doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2020.10.010 · Cited by 69
Genetic approaches to enhance multiple stress tolerance in maize
Malenica, N., Dunić, J. A., Vukadinović, L., Cesar, V., & Šimić, D. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12111760 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, D., Rieu, I., Mariani, C., & van Dam, N. M.
- Venue
- Plant Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2016-04-19
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 727-740
- ISSN
- 0167-4412 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5028
- OpenAlex
- W2339487201
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 135
- FWCI
- 33.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How plants handle multiple stresses: hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11103-016-0481-8
- The paper
- Nguyen, D., Rieu, I., Mariani, C., & van Dam, N. M. (2016). How plants handle multiple stresses: hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory. Plant Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-016-0481-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
