Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SOC is mainly derived from root C, root exudates, and fine root turnover.
“Rasse et al. (2005) assert that SOC is mainly derived from root C, from root exudates and fine root turnover.”
From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Rasse et al., 2005
Soil carbon storage is linked to root inputs including root exudation, which is known to change the activity and composition of the microbial community.
“Second, soil carbon storage is linked to root inputs 31,32 including root exudation, which is known to change the activity and composition of the microbial community 33 .”
From Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage (2015) · cites this paper as [32]
Fine root carbon is a measure of carbon input and basal respiration is a measure of microbial metabolic activity, and both were included as variables potentially mediating plant community effects.
“As variables potentially mediating plant community effects we included fine root carbon as measure of carbon input 31,32 and basal respiration as measure of microbial metabolic activity 20,34,37 .”
From Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage (2015) · cites this paper as [32]
Rhizodeposition and root exudates can cause a priming effect on the turnover of stored soil carbon, which could increase soil carbon emission and lower the sequestration rate.
“Rhizodeposition and root exudates can cause a priming effect on the turnover of C stored in the soil [100], which could increase soil C emission [101, 102] and lower the sequestration rate.”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [100]
The view that roots contribute more to soil organic carbon than aboveground sources seems reflected in the figures, and recent data showed a tight relationship between root and Miscanthus-derived soil organic carbon.
“The view that roots contribute more to SOC than aboveground sources [100] seems to be reflected in Figs. 3b and 4, and recent data showed a tight relationship between root and Miscanthus-derived SOC [80].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 157 · Cited by 1,861
- Authors
- Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C., & Dignac, M.-F.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Rasse, Daniel P.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 341-356
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2060590119
- Cited by
- 1,861
- References
- 157
- Citations by year
- 2026: 118 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 27.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- root-derived carbon, carbon residence time, root exudation, mycorrhizal hyphae, root hairs, metal ion interactions, soil depth, carbon sequestration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review