Cited by 1,861Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation

Rasse, Daniel P., Rumpel, Cornelia, Dignac, Marie-France·2005·Plant and Soil

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11104-004-0907-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SOC is mainly derived from root C, root exudates, and fine root turnover.

    “Rasse et al. (2005) assert that SOC is mainly derived from root C, from root exudates and fine root turnover.”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Rasse et al., 2005

  • Soil carbon storage is linked to root inputs including root exudation, which is known to change the activity and composition of the microbial community.

    “Second, soil carbon storage is linked to root inputs 31,32 including root exudation, which is known to change the activity and composition of the microbial community 33 .”
  • Fine root carbon is a measure of carbon input and basal respiration is a measure of microbial metabolic activity, and both were included as variables potentially mediating plant community effects.

    “As variables potentially mediating plant community effects we included fine root carbon as measure of carbon input 31,32 and basal respiration as measure of microbial metabolic activity 20,34,37 .”
  • Rhizodeposition and root exudates can cause a priming effect on the turnover of stored soil carbon, which could increase soil carbon emission and lower the sequestration rate.

    “Rhizodeposition and root exudates can cause a priming effect on the turnover of C stored in the soil [100], which could increase soil C emission [101, 102] and lower the sequestration rate.”
  • The view that roots contribute more to soil organic carbon than aboveground sources seems reflected in the figures, and recent data showed a tight relationship between root and Miscanthus-derived soil organic carbon.

    “The view that roots contribute more to SOC than aboveground sources [100] seems to be reflected in Figs. 3b and 4, and recent data showed a tight relationship between root and Miscanthus-derived SOC [80].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 157 · Cited by 1,861

Authors
Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C., & Dignac, M.-F.
Affiliations
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
Corresponding author
Rasse, Daniel P.
Venue
Plant and Soil
Published
2005-02
Volume
269
Issue
1-2
Pages
341-356
ISSN
  • 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5036
OpenAlex
W2060590119
Cited by
1,861
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 60
FWCI
27.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
root-derived carbon, carbon residence time, root exudation, mycorrhizal hyphae, root hairs, metal ion interactions, soil depth, carbon sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review