Initial decay of woody fragments in soil is influenced by size, vertical position, nitrogen availability and soil origin
Open accessAbstract
Fast-growing bacteria and fungi are expected to cause the initial stage of decomposition of woody fragments in and on soils, i.e. the respiration of sugars, organic acids, pectin and easily accessible cellulose and hemi-cellulose. However, little is known about the factors regulating initial wood decomposition. We examined the effect of wood fragment size, vertical position, nitrogen addition and soil origin on initial wood decay and on the relative importance of fungi and bacteria therein. Two fractions of birch wood were used in microcosm experiments, namely wood blocks (dimensions: 3 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm) and sawdust (dimensions: 0.5–2 mm). The woody fragments were enclosed in nylon bags and placed on top of- or buried in an abandoned arable soil and in a heathland soil. After 15, 25 and 40 weeks of incubation, fungal biomass was quantified (as ergosterol and chitin content) and bacterial numbers were determined. The results indicated that initial wood decay was mostly caused by fungi; bacteria were only contributing in sawdust in/on abandoned arable soil. Larger fragment size, burial of fragments and nitrogen addition positively influenced fungal biomass and activity. Fungal biomass and decay activities were much lower in woody fragments incubated in/on heathland soil than in those incubated in/on abandoned arable soil, indicating that soil origin is also an important factor determining initial wood decay.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the birch sawdust study, N-induced increase of fungal biomass was accompanied with increased activity of cellulose-degrading enzymes but not lignin-degrading enzymes.
“In that study, the N-induced increase of fungal biomass in birch sawdust was accompanied with an increased activity of cellulose-degrading enzymes but not of lignin-degrading enzymes.”
From The hidden potential of saprotrophic fungi in arable soil: Patterns of short-term stimulation by organic amendments (2020) · cites this paper as van der Wal et al., 2007
Addition of lignocellulose-rich organic materials appears to be a key stimulant, as incorporation of straw and wood residues in arable or ex-arable soils were found to be associated with heightened saprotrophic fungal biomass.
“Indeed, addition of lignocellulose-rich organic materials appears to be a key stimulant, as incorporation of straw and wood residues in arable or ex-arable soils were found to be associated with heightened saprotrophic fungal biomass (van der Wal et al., 2007;Moll et al., 2015;Reardon and Wuest, 2016).”
From The hidden potential of saprotrophic fungi in arable soil: Patterns of short-term stimulation by organic amendments (2020) · cites this paper as van der Wal et al., 2007
A similar observation of N-induced increase of fungal biomass has been made for birch sawdust in an exarable soil.
“A similar observation has been made for birch sawdust in an exarable soil (van der Wal et al., 2007).”
From The hidden potential of saprotrophic fungi in arable soil: Patterns of short-term stimulation by organic amendments (2020) · cites this paper as van der Wal et al., 2007
Cites
Eiland, F., Klamer, M., Lind, A.-M., Leth, M., & Bååth, E. (2001) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s002480000071 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Braadbaart, F., & Poole, I. (2008) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.03.016 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Clocchiatti, A., Hannula, S. E., van den Berg, M., Korthals, G., & de Boer, W. (2020) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103434 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationClark, G. J., Sale, P. W. G., & Tang, C. (2009) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr09119 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- van der Wal, A., de Boer, W., Smant, W., & van Veen, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NL)
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2007-10-12
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 189-201
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2116736222
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie
- Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- vertical position, nitrogen addition, soil origin, fungal biomass, bacterial biomass, birch wood, sawdust, heathland soils, microcosm experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review