Farmer-oriented assessment of soil quality using field, laboratory, and VNIR spectroscopy methods
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Cornell Soil Health Test is much more standardized and targeted directly at land users, offering various soil health testing packages for farmers, landscape managers and others, and supplying them with management advice together with the results.
“The Cornell Soil Health Test (Idowu et al., 2008; Moebius-Clune et al., 2016) is much more standardized and targeted directly at land users, o ff ering various soil health testing packages for farmers, landscape managers and others, and supplying them with management advice together with the results.”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Idowu et al., 2008
Practical considerations such as the disadvantage of indicators requiring undisturbed samples often play an important role in discarding otherwise suitable soil quality indicators.
“Practical considerations such as the disadvantage of indicators requiring undisturbed samples often play an important role in discarding otherwise suitable soil quality indicators (Idowu et al., 2008)”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Idowu et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 216
- Authors
- Idowu, O. J., van Es, H. M., Abawi, G. S., Wolfe, D. W., Ball, J. I., Gugino, B. K., Moebius, B. N., Schindelbeck, R. R., & Bilgili, A. V.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2008-01-24
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 243-253
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2083143331
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Northeast SARE
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- soil health, soil quality indicators, soil health assessment, visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, soil physical properties, soil bioindicators, soil chemical properties, soil management, soil constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
