The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms
Open accessAbstract
The rhizosphere is a hot spot of microbial interactions as exudates released by plant roots are a main food source for microorganisms and a driving force of their population density and activities. The rhizosphere harbors many organisms that have a neutral effect on the plant, but also attracts organisms that exert deleterious or beneficial effects on the plant. Microorganisms that adversely affect plant growth and health are the pathogenic fungi, oomycetes, bacteria and nematodes. Most of the soilborne pathogens are adapted to grow and survive in the bulk soil, but the rhizosphere is the playground and infection court where the pathogen establishes a parasitic relationship with the plant. The rhizosphere is also a battlefield where the complex rhizosphere community, both microflora and microfauna, interact with pathogens and influence the outcome of pathogen infection. A wide range of microorganisms are beneficial to the plant and include nitrogen-fixing bacteria, endo- and ectomycorrhizal fungi, and plant growth-promoting bacteria and fungi. This review focuses on the population dynamics and activity of soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Specific attention is given to mechanisms involved in the tripartite interactions between beneficial microorganisms, pathogens and the plant. We also discuss how agricultural practices affect pathogen and antagonist populations and how these practices can be adopted to promote plant growth and health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.026583 · Cited by 1,308
B IOCONTROL W ITHIN THE C ONTEXT OF S OIL M ICROBIAL C OMMUNITIES: A Substrate-Dependent Phenomenon
Hoitink, H., & Boehm, M. (1999) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.427 · Cited by 843
Cited by
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Compant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 · Cited by 2,318
Rhizosphere interactions: root exudates, microbes, and microbial communities
Huang, X.-F., Chaparro, J. M., Reardon, K. F., Zhang, R., Shen, Q., & Vivanco, J. M. (2014) · Botany · doi:10.1139/cjb-2013-0225 · Cited by 824
Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes
Lareen, A., Burton, F., & Schäfer, P. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0417-8 · Cited by 668
Functional Soil Microbiome: Belowground Solutions to an Aboveground Problem
Lakshmanan, V., Selvaraj, G., & Bais, H. P. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.245811 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Raaijmakers, J. M., Paulitz, T. C., Steinberg, C., Alabouvette, C., & Moënne-Loccoz, Y.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2008-02-23
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 341-361
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2151709988
- Cited by
- 1,706
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11104-008-9568-6
- The paper
- Raaijmakers, J. M., Paulitz, T. C., Steinberg, C., Alabouvette, C., & Moënne-Loccoz, Y. (2009). The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9568-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.