Cited by 226Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPeatlands and Wetlands EcologySoil erosion and sediment transport

Effect of biochar amendment on the soil-atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases from an intensive subtropical pasture in northern new south wales, australia

Open access
Scheer, Clemens, Grace, Peter R., Rowlings, David W., Kimber, Stephen, Van Zwieten, Lukas·2011·Plant and Soil

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11104-011-0759-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have found no differences or even increases in cumulative N2O emissions after biochar addition.

    “while other studies have found no differences or even increases in cumulative N 2 O emissions after biochar addition [61-63].”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 226

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Adam P 1994 Australian Rainforests. Oxford University Press.
  2. Rondon M, Ramirez J A and Lehmann J 2005 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Decrease with Charcoal Additions to Tropical Soils. In Proceedings of the 3rd USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sequestration, Baltimore, USA, March 21-24, 2005. pp 208.
  3. Sinclair K, Slavich P, Van Zwieten L and Downie A 2009 Productivity and nutrient availability on a ferrosol: Biochar, lime and fertiliser. In 1st Asia Pacific Biochar Conference, Gold Coast 17- 20 May, 2009. pp 79. ISBN 978 0 7347 1973

Authors
Scheer, C., Grace, P. R., Rowlings, D. W., Kimber, S., & Van Zwieten, L.
Corresponding author
Scheer, Clemens
Venue
Plant and Soil
Published
2011-03-08
Volume
345
Issue
1-2
Pages
47-58
ISSN
  • 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5036
OpenAlex
W2025194901
Cited by
226
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
24.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
biochar amendment, nitrous oxide emissions, methane uptake, CO2 emissions, subtropical pasture, feedlot, Ferrosol, soil microbial processes, northern New South Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review