Influence of biochar on drought tolerance of Chenopodium quinoa willd and on soil-plant relations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Amendment of soil with biochar has been shown to increase water retention capacity.
“amendment of soil with biochar has been shown to increase water retention capacity [15-17]”
From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 425
- Authors
- Kammann, C. I., Linsel, S., Gößling, J. W., & Koyro, H.-W.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kammann, Claudia Irene
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2011-04-05
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 195-210
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2428028230
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 27.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Silicon Effects in Agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Keywords
- biochar, drought tolerance, quinoa, water use efficiency, soil carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions, nitrous oxide emissions, soil respiration, nitrogen accumulation, proline, chlorophyll, elevated CO2 effects, sandy soil, pyrogenic carbon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
