The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coarse and fine root plants affect pore size distributions differently
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: Small scale root-pore interactions require validation of their impact on effective hydraulic processes at the field scale. Our objective was to develop an interpretative framework linking root effects on macroscopic pore parameters with knowledge at the rhizosphere scale. METHODS: A field experiment with twelve species from different families was conducted. Parameters of Kosugi's pore size distribution (PSD) model were determined inversely from tension infiltrometer data. Measured root traits were related to pore variables by regression analysis. A pore evolution model was used to analyze if observed pore dynamics followed a diffusion like process. RESULTS: Roots essentially conditioned soil properties at the field scale. Rooting densities higher than 0.5 % of pore space stabilized soil structure against pore loss. Coarse root systems increased macroporosity by 30 %. Species with dense fine root systems induced heterogenization of the pore space and higher micropore volume. We suggested particle re-orientation and aggregate coalescence as main underlying processes. The diffusion type pore evolution model could only partially capture the observed PSD dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: Root systems differing in axes morphology induced distinctive pore dynamics. Scaling between these effective hydraulic impacts and processes at the root-pore interface is essential for plant based management of soil structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
World Reference Base for Soil Resources
Driessen, P., Nachtergaele, F., Spaargaren, O., & Seppe Deckers, J. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Second Edition · doi:10.1201/noe0849338304.ch410 · Cited by 7,248
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., & Denef, K. (2004) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008 · Cited by 4,410
Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., & van Genuchten, M. T. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00466-8 · Cited by 2,640
EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts
Bell, A., Main, I. G., Atkinson, M., Vicente, R. F., Meredith, P. G., & Boon, S. A. (2013) · Cited by 2,435
Methods of Studying Root Systems
Böhm, W. (1979) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-67282-8 · Cited by 2,028
World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006
Ausgabe, D. (2007) · Cited by 1,696
Dexter, A. R. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.004 · Cited by 1,284
Interactions and Self-Organization in the Soil-Microbe Complex
Young, I. M., & Crawford, J. W. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097394 · Cited by 933
Soil organic matter and available water capacity
Hudson, B. D. (1994) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.1080/00224561.1994.12456850 · Cited by 881
Metadata
- Authors
- Bodner, G., Leitner, D., & Kaul, H.-P.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2014-03-14
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 133-151
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2094743463
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coarse and fine root plants affect pore size distributions differently. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11104-014-2079-8
- The paper
- Bodner, G., Leitner, D., & Kaul, H.-P. (2014). Coarse and fine root plants affect pore size distributions differently. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2079-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.