Biochar but not humic acid product amendment affected maize yields via improving plant-soil moisture relations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biochar application for poor sandy soils improved maize plant growth by improving soil-plant water relations (improved relative water content and leaf osmotic potential) and photosynthesis (reduced stomatal resistance and stimulated photosynthesis by increasing the electron transport rate of photosystem II).
“In addition, Haider et al. (2015) have reported that biochar application for poor sandy soils improved maize plant growth by improving soil-plant water relations (improved relative water content and leaf osmotic potential) and photosynthesis (reduced stomatal resistance and stimulated photosynthesis by increasing the electron transport rate of photosystem II).”
From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Haider et al., 2015
Biochar application in poor sandy soils improved plant growth by improving soil-plant water relations under well-watered and drought conditions.
“Haider et al. (2015) reported that biochar application in poor sandy soils improved plant growth by improving soil-plant water relations under well-watered and drought conditions.”
From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Haider et al., 2015
Several studies have shown that biochars improve crop productivity under normal conditions and also improve crop yield under adverse conditions such as salinity, drought and heavy metals.
“Several studies in last decades have shown that biochars not only improve crop productivity under normal conditions, but also improve crop yield under the adverse conditions such as salinity, drought and heavy metals (Haider et al., 2015;Joseph et al., 2013;Park et al., 2011;Pressler et al., 2017).”
From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Haider et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 105 · Cited by 209
- Authors
- Haider, G., Koyro, H.-W., Azam, F., Steffens, D., Müller, C., & Kammann, C.
- Affiliations
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Haider, Ghulam
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2014-10-21
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 141-157
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W1990184009
- Semantic Scholar
- 7651a8ea5315498b4dfe403e6148ddca70183573
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
- Keywords
- biochar, maize, soil amendment, water-limited environments, photosynthesis, stomatal resistance, leaf osmotic potential, relative water content, water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency, sandy soil, drought stress, synergistic effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
