The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial populations in juvenile maize rhizospheres originate from both seed and soil
Open accessAbstract
Background and aims To assess the impacts of soil microbes and plant genotype on the composition of maize associated bacterial communities. Methods Two genotypes of Brazilian maize were planted indoors on sterile sand, a deep underground subsoil, and a nutrient-rich topsoil from the Amazon jungle (terra preta). DNA was extracted from rhizospheres, phyllospheres, and surface sterilized roots for 16S rDNA fingerprinting and next generation sequencing. Results Neither plant genotype nor soil type appeared to influence bacterial diversity in phyllospheres or endospheres. Rhizospheres showed strikingly similar 16S rDNA ordination of both fingerprinting and sequencing data, with soil type driving grouping patterns and genotype having a significant impact only on sterile sand. Rhizospheres grown in non-sterile soils contained greater bacterial diversity than sterile-sand grown ones, however the dominant OTUs (species of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes) were found in all rhizospheres suggesting seeds as a common source of inoculum. Rhizospheres of the commercial hybrid appeared to contain less bacterial diversity than the landrace. Conclusions Maize rhizospheres receive diverse bacteria from soil, are influenced by the genotype or treatment of the seed, and are dominated by species of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. As many dominant 16S rDNA sequences were observed in rhizospheres grown in both sterile and non-sterile substrate, we conclude that the most common bacterial cells in juvenile maize rhizospheres are seed transmitted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Cited by
The seed microbiome: Origins, interactions, and impacts
Nelson, E. B. (2018) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3289-7 · Cited by 560
Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management
White, J. F., Kingsley, K. L., Zhang, Q., Verma, R., Obi, N., Dvinskikh, S., Elmore, M. T., Verma, S. K., Gond, S. K., & Kowalski, K. P. (2019) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.5527 · Cited by 466
Maize synthesized benzoxazinoids affect the host associated microbiome
Kudjordjie, E. N., Sapkota, R., Steffensen, S. K., Fomsgaard, I. S., & Nicolaisen, M. (2019) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0677-7 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnston-Monje, D., Lundberg, D. S., Lazarovits, G., Reis, V. M., & Raizada, M. N.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2016-03-31
- Volume
- 405
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 337-355
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2323846277
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial populations in juvenile maize rhizospheres originate from both seed and soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11104-016-2826-0
- The paper
- Johnston-Monje, D., Lundberg, D. S., Lazarovits, G., Reis, V. M., & Raizada, M. N. (2016). Bacterial populations in juvenile maize rhizospheres originate from both seed and soil. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2826-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.