The DOI matches its Crossref record; 250 of the 250 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Root anatomy and soil resource capture
Open accessAbstract
Background: Suboptimal water and nutrient availability are primary constraints in global agriculture. Root anatomy plays key roles in soil resource acquisition. In this article we summarize evidence that root anatomical phenotypes present opportunities for crop breeding. Scope: Root anatomical phenotypes influence soil resource acquisition by regulating the metabolic cost of soil exploration, exploitation of the rhizosphere, the penetration of hard soil domains, the axial and radial transport of water, and interactions with soil biota including mycorrhizal fungi, pathogens, insects, and the rhizosphere microbiome. For each of these topics we provide examples of anatomical phenotypes which merit attention as selection targets for crop improvement. Several cross-cutting issues are addressed including the importance of phenotypic plasticity, integrated phenotypes, C sequestration, in silico modeling, and novel methods to phenotype root anatomy including image analysis tools. Conclusions: An array of anatomical phenes have substantial importance for the acquisition of water and nutrients. Substantial phenotypic variation exists in crop germplasm. New tools and methods are making it easier to phenotype root anatomy, determine its genetic control, and understand its utility for plant fitness. Root anatomical phenotypes are underutilized yet attractive breeding targets for the development of the efficient, resilient crops urgently needed in global agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
(2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-370526-6.x5001-6 · Cited by 7,431
ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data
Rueden, C. T., Schindelin, J., Hiner, M. C., DeZonia, B. E., Walter, A. E., Arena, E. T., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z · Cited by 5,980
THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATE AND VEGETATION
Jobbágy, E. G., & Jackson, R. B. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:tvdoso]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,428
Carpita, N., & Gibeaut, D. (1993) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.00999.x · Cited by 3,651
(2019) · Cited by 3,602
Cosgrove, D. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1746 · Cited by 3,308
Soil carbon pools and world life zones
Post, W. M., Emanuel, W. R., Zinke, P. J., & Stangenberger, A. G. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/298156a0 · Cited by 2,255
Kögel-Knabner, I. (2002) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(01)00158-4 · Cited by 1,993
Richardson, A. E., Barea, J.-M., McNeill, A. M., & Prigent-Combaret, C. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-009-9895-2 · Cited by 1,966
Cited by
Solomon, W., Janda, T., & Molnár, Z. (2024) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108290 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, J. P., Strock, C. F., Schneider, H. M., Sidhu, J. S., Ajmera, I., Galindo-Castañeda, T., Klein, S. P., & Hanlon, M. T.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2021-07-07
- Volume
- 466
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 21-63
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W3180013643
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 250
- FWCI
- 19.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root anatomy and soil resource capture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11104-021-05010-y
- The paper
- Lynch, J. P., Strock, C. F., Schneider, H. M., Sidhu, J. S., Ajmera, I., Galindo-Castañeda, T., Klein, S. P., & Hanlon, M. T. (2021). Root anatomy and soil resource capture. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05010-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.