The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies
(1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527692 · Cited by 4,190
Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies
Bandura, A. (1995) · Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527692.003 · Cited by 1,703
Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613722 · Cited by 1,349
Cited by
Nabatchi, T. (2010) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074009356467 · Cited by 321
Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of critical consciousness
Diemer, M. A., McWhirter, E. H., Ozer, E. J., & Rapa, L. J. (2015) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/s11256-015-0336-7 · Cited by 167
Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting
Johnson, C., Carlson, H. J., & Reynolds, S. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09679-w · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrell, M. E.
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-69
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W2027260552
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
