CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 245Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change Policy and EconomicsElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Collective Action and Citizen Responses to Global Warming

Lubell, Mark, Zahran, Sammy, Vedlitz, Arnold·2007·Political Behavior
DOI 10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ensuring people perceive their own actions and/or those of their group as impactful increases action.

    “This means ensuring people perceive their own actions and/or those of their group as impactful (Finkel & Mueller, 1998;Lubell et al., 2007).”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Lubell et al., 2007

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 245

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Aldrich, J. H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 76, 246–278. · DOI
  2. Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  4. Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89, 24. · DOI
  5. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302–339. · DOI
  7. Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspirations and reality. Rationality and Society, 10, 79–102. · DOI
  8. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
  9. Elliott, E., Seldon, B., & Regens, J. (1997). Political and economic Determinants of individuals’ support for environmental spending. Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 15–27. · DOI
  10. Everett, J. W., & Peirce, J. J. (1992). Social networks, socioeconomic status, and environmental collective action: Residential curbside block leader recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 21, 65–84. · DOI
  11. Finkel, S. E., & Muller, E. N. (1998). Rational choice and the dynamics of political action: Evaluating alternative models with panel data. The American Political Science Review, 92, 37–49. · DOI
  12. Finkel, S. E., Muller, E. N., & Opp, K.-D. (1989). Personal influence, collective rationality, and mass political action. The American Political Science Review, 83, 885–903. · DOI
  13. Gibson, J. L. (1997). Mass opposition to the Soviet putsch of August 1991: Collective action, rational choice, and democratic values in the former Soviet Union. The American Political Science Review, 91, 671–684. · DOI
  14. Godwin, K., & Mitchell, R. C. (1982). Rational models, collective goods, and non-electoral political behavior. The Western Political Quarterly, 35, 161–181. · DOI
  15. Gutierrez Karp, D. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111–133. · DOI
  16. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 81, 1197–1216. · DOI
  17. Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology, 57, 28–47. · DOI
  18. Kenny, C. B. (1992). Political participation and effects from the social environment. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 259–267. · DOI
  19. Leighley, J. E. (1995). Attitudes, opportunities, and incentives: A field essay on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 181–209. · DOI
  20. Lubell, M. (2002). Environmental activism as collective action. Environment and Behavior, 34, 431–454. · DOI
  21. Lubell, M., Vedlitz, A., Zahran, S., & Alston, L. (2006). Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 149–160. · DOI
  22. Mohai, P. (1985). Public concern and elite involvement in environmental conservation issues. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 820–838.
  23. Mohai, P., & Twight, B. W. (1987). Age and environmentalism: An evaluation of the Buttell model using national survey evidence. Social Science Quarterly, 68, 798–815.
  24. Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1407–1413. · DOI
  25. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  26. Opp, K. -D. (2001). Why do people vote? The cognitive illusion proposition and its test. Kyklos, 54, 355–378. · DOI
  27. Ostrom, E. (1980). Governing the commons. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. The American Political Science Review, 92, 1–22. · DOI
  29. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional dversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  30. Parker, J. D., & McDonough, M. H. (1999). Environmentalism of African Americans: An analysis of the subculture and barriers theories. Environment and Behavior, 31, 155–177. · DOI
  31. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  32. Rohrschneider, R. (1990). The roots of public opinion toward new social movements: An empirical test of competing explanations. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 1–30. · DOI
  33. Samdahl, D. M., & Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern: A specification and test of the model. Environment and Behavior, 21, 57–81. · DOI
  34. Schlozman, K. L., Burns, N., & Verba, S. (1994). Gender and pathways to participation: The role of resources. The Journal of Politics, 56, 963–990. · DOI
  35. Seguin, C., Pelletier, L. G., & Hunsley, J. (1998). Toward a model of environmental activism. Environment and Behavior, 30, 628–652. · DOI
  36. South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327–347. · DOI
  37. Steel, B. S. (1996). Thinking globally and acting locally?: Environmental attitudes, behavior and activism. Journal of Environmental Management, 47, 27–36. · DOI
  38. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–84. · DOI
  39. Van Liere, K. D., & Riley, E. D. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181–197. · DOI
  40. Whiteley, P. F. (1995). Rational choice and political participation: Evaluating the debate. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 211–233.

Metadata

Authors
Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Lubell, Mark
ORCID
Venue
Political Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-02-21
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
391-413
ISSN
  • 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6687
DOI
10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2
OpenAlex
W2102598821
Cited by
245
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
collective action, global warming, climate change, policy support, environmental behavior, risk perception, personal efficacy, environmental values, Elinor Ostrom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review