A Quantitative Investigation of the Population-Land Inequality-Land Clearance Nexus
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tole (2004) argues that the degree of land accessibility is a function of rural population density and land inequality, and unequal systems do worse in accommodating population pressures.
“In her framework, the degree of land accessibility is a function of rural population density and land inequality, where unequal systems do worse in accommodating population pressures than more egalitarian systems.”
From Land inequality and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as Tole, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Land inequality and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Sant'anna, A. A. (2017) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x1600022x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tole, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tole, Lise
- Venue
- Population and Environment
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-106
- ISSN
- 0199-0039 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7810
- OpenAlex
- W2050441124
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Population and Environment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Keywords
- land inequality, population growth, rural population growth, land distribution, nonlinear threshold effects, rural poverty, rural investment, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review