Hurricane Katrina: Who Stayed and Why?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing studies are primarily focused on migration within or from low- and middle-income countries, with the US as a notable exception.
“Existing studies are primarily focused on migration within or from low-and middle-income countries, with the US as a notable exception (e.g., Fussell et al., 2014a;Thiede and Brown, 2013).”
From Improving the evidence base: A methodological review of the quantitative climate migration literature (2021) · cites this paper as Thiede and Brown, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Thiede, B. C., & Brown, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thiede, Brian C.
- Venue
- Population Research and Policy Review
- Published
- 2013-09-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 803-824
- ISSN
- 0167-5923 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7829
- OpenAlex
- W2009606754
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Population Research and Policy Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
- Keywords
- Hurricane Katrina, disaster evacuation, population displacement, race, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, social networks, geographic location
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
