Testing the Only-Child Advantage in Cognitive Development in the Context of China’s One-Child Policy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have found no significant cognitive or behavioral differences between only children and children with a sibling.
“Studies have found no significant cognitive or behavioral differences between only children and children with a sibling (Poston & Yu 1985, Poston & Falbo 1990, Song & Wang 2019).”
From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Song & Wang 2019
Cites
Two Is Best? The Persistence of a Two‐Child Family Ideal in Europe
Sobotka, T., & Beaujouan, É. (2014) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Looking Locally at China's One-Child Policy
Short, S. E., & Fengying, Z. (1998) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.2307/172250 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
The Only Child in America: Prejudice versus Performance
Blake, J. (1981) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1972763 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Feeney, G., & Feng, W. (1993) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2938385 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy
Cai, Y., & Feng, W. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090220-032839 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
- Authors
- Song, S., & Wang, W.
- Affiliations
- Queens College, CUNY (US)
- Renmin University of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Song, Shige
- Venue
- Population Research and Policy Review
- Published
- 2019-10-16
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 841-867
- ISSN
- 0167-5923 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7829
- OpenAlex
- W2980351591
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Population Research and Policy Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- only children, cognitive development, one-child policy, birth order, gender differences, sibling effects, junior high school students, China, family planning policy, subgroup heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
