A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research on ride-hailing has found that adopters are mainly young and highly educated people with increased levels of technology embracement.
“Previous research on ride-hailing has focused on the effects that the built environment, demographic variables, and personal attitudes have on the frequency of ride-hailing use, finding that adopters are mainly young and highly educated people with increased levels of technology embracement.”
From Ready to ride: security and transit-related determinants of ride-hailing adoption in Latin America (2022) · cites this paper as Dias et al., 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modeling individuals’ willingness to share trips with strangers in an autonomous vehicle future
Lavieri, P. S., & Bhat, C. R. (2019) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.03.009 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Self-citationReady to ride: security and transit-related determinants of ride-hailing adoption in Latin America
Oviedo, D., Sabogal-Cardona, O., & Scholl, L. (2022) · Inter-American Development Bank · doi:10.18235/0004656 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Specific research on the determinants of adoption have consistently shown that younger generations with high educational attainment and living in urban areas are more likely to adopt ride-hailing services (Alemi et al., 2018b, 2018a; Dias et al., 2017).”
- Authors
- Dias, F. F., Lavieri, P. S., Garikapati, V. M., Astroza, S., Pendyala, R. M., & Bhat, C. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Bhat, Chandra R.
- Venue
- Transportation
- Published
- 2017-07-26
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1307-1323
- ISSN
- 0049-4488 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9435
- OpenAlex
- W2609250418
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 25.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Transportation Research Board 96th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Transportation (DTRT13-G-UTC58)
- American Friends of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Keywords
- car sharing, ride-hailing, mobility-on-demand, service adoption, socio-economic determinants, built environment, children, urban density, travel demand forecasting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
