Cited by 220Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationTraffic control and management

Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin, Texas network using agent-based simulation

Open access
Liu, Jun, Kockelman, Kara M., Boesch, Patrick M., Ciari, Francesco·2017·Transportation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11116-017-9811-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Possibility of total distance-based (lifecycle and driving cycle) savings of GHG emissions is 16.8-42.7% due to introduction of SAV systems, and this savings cannot be negated by extra VKT due to AV's advancement, eco-technologies, and change in energy source.

    “Possibility of total distance-based (lifecycle and driving cycle) savings of GHG emissions is 16.8-42.7% due to introduction of SAV systems, and this savings cannot be negated by extra VKT due to AV's advancement, eco-technologies, and change in energy source”
  • SAVs will be preferred over conventional private cars in rural areas at lower fares ($0.31 or $0.47 per km compared to $0.62 and $0.78 per km).

    “Liu et al. (2017) also support this, who state that SAVs will be preferred over conventional private cars in rural areas at lower fares ($0.31 or $0.47 per km compared to $0.62 and $0.78 per km).”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2017

  • Liu et al. (2017) uses the modelling method from Bösch et al. (2016) for simulation of SAV operations.

    “The modelling method from Bösch et al. (2016) is used for simulation of SAV operations.”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Liu et al. (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., Kockelman, K. M., Boesch, P. M., & Ciari, F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Kockelman, Kara M.
Venue
Transportation
Published
2017-08-23
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1261-1278
ISSN
  • 0049-4488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9435
OpenAlex
W2749760279
Cited by
220
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
shared autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicles, mode choice, vehicle miles traveled, empty miles, fare pricing, vehicle fleet operations, travel demand, trip distance, Austin, Texas, MATSim

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review